I was told promising violence over political issues was frowned upon? Was I misinformed or is that just a rule for one side of the debate?
Here’s what she’s saying. If they don’t get to kill babies, they’re gonna’ redirect that violence elsewhere.
That’s a nice country you got. It’d be a shame if something happened to it.
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., issued a warning to the Supreme Court days before oral arguments in a potential landmark abortion case, claiming that a “revolution” will take place if the high court overturns existing precedent.
.@SenatorShaheen on new abortion restrictions going into effect in N.H. & the upcoming Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization case: "I think if you want to see a revolution, go ahead, outlaw Roe v. Wade and see what the response is…" #NHPolitics #WMUR pic.twitter.com/O7weoVuOSk
— Adam Sexton (@AdamSextonWMUR) November 29, 2021
Sickening.
In case you can’t watch the video. She said, “”I hope the Supreme Court is listening to the people of the United States because – to go back to Adam Sexton’s question – I think if you want to see a revolution go ahead, outlaw Roe v. Wade and see what the response is of the public, particularly young people.”
Wait. Is she talking about these young people?
Or these?
Nah. I think she means these:
November 30, 2021 at 7:05 pm
Well, if It comes, it can’t come soon enough. Should’ve happened the day after Roe v Wade. The ‘Triumph of the Will’ cannot stand much longer, especially ill will.
December 1, 2021 at 8:22 am
“outlaw Roe v. Wade” Roe is not law, it’s judicial overreach. If anything, Roe sets the stage to protect the preborn from conception using its personhood argument vis the 14th amendment to the US Const.