If “when does a baby become human?” is an irrelevant question when considering abortion what else is there.
At least when Barack Obama was asked this question he sidestepped with false humility by saying the answer to that question was above his pay grade.
What question should be asked then, if not that one?
This Democrat Representative from Minnesota clarifies that it doesn’t matter when the baby is considered human because it all matters on who is considering it? This is the most anti-science response you could imagine, as if reality itself bent to our own will.
But that is where the modern left has led us. There is no reality. There is only my perception of it which must be enforced upon others.
She doesn’t actually mean “irrelevant.” What she means is “I don’t care.”
January 25, 2023 at 9:00 am
This is antiscience – yes.
It is also the left’s way of saying, “we clearly lost this one…move on, nothing to see here.”
January 25, 2023 at 11:18 am
All of the wars in American history have done less harm than old dingbats like this.
That’s not hyperbole. Approximately one and one third million deaths since the American Revolution. This is about the same average number of aborted children per year over the past 50 years.
January 25, 2023 at 12:50 pm
“This Democrat Representative from Minnesota clarifies that it doesn’t matter when the baby is considered human because it all matters on who is considering it”.
I wrote a piece when the Big Guy was running for US President that addresses this belief and just posted it to my blog here (“Unalienable Essence – Sartre and Abortion).
January 26, 2023 at 10:53 am
Yep, this is the garbage that represents me in my home state of MN. A sick individual along with another MN Dem representative that justifies abortion because being a mom is difficult. Need to kill the baby. Sickening but true