Ah, thes esteemed halls of one of our finest institutions of higher learning in the US. Harvard. Where one can sit at the feet of world renowned scholars and listen sagacious phrases such as “Ya, I’ll speak with your mama outside.”
Below you will find the text of a police report in which a top American black scholar Henry Louis Gates,Alphonse Fletcher University Professor at Harvard University, where he is Director of the W. E. B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research, was arrested for disorderly conduct.
Professor Gates, for his part, suspects that race played a part in his arrest. After reading this report, I suspect that racism played a large part in the events of that evening. We report – you decide.
On Thursday July 16, 2009, Henry Gates, Jr. – -, of Ware Street, Cambridge, MA) was placed under arrest at Ware Street, after being observed exhibiting loud and tumultuous behavior, in a public place, directed at a uniformed police officer who was present investigating a report of a crime in progress. These actions on the behalf of Gates served no legitimate purpose and caused citizens passing by this location to stop and take notice while appearing surprised and alarmed.
On the above time and date, I was on uniformed duty in an unmarked police cruiser assigned to the Administration Section, working from 7:00 AM-3:30 PM. At approximately 12:44 PM, I was operating my cruiser on Harvard Street near Ware Street. At that time, I overheard an ECC broadcast for a possible break in progress at Ware Street. Due to my proximity, I responded.When I arrived at Ware Street I radioed ECC and asked that they have the caller meet me at the front door to this residence. I was told that the caller was already outside. As I was getting this information, I climbed the porch stairs toward the front door. As [reached the door, a female voice called out to me. I looked in the direction of the voice and observed a white female, later identified {} who was standing on the sidewalk in front of the residence, held a wireless telephone in her hand arid told me that it was she who called. She went on to tell me that she observed what appeared to be two black males with backpacks on the porch of• Ware Street. She told me that her suspicions were aroused when she observed one of the men wedging his shoulder into the door as if he was trying to force entry. Since I was the only police officer on location and had my back to the front door as I spoke with her, I asked that she wait for other responding officers while I investigated further.
As I turned and faced the door, I could see an older black male standing in the foyer of {} Ware Street. I made this observation through the glass paned front door. As I stood in plain view of this man, later identified as Gates, I asked if he would step out onto the porch and speak with me. He replied “no I will not”. He then demanded to know who I was. I told him that I was “Sgt. Crowley from the Cambridge Police” and that I was “investigating a report of a break in progress” at the residence. While I was making this statement, Gates opened the front door and exclaimed “why, because I’m a black man in America?”. I then asked Gates if there was anyone else in the residence. While yelling, he told me that it was none of my business and accused me of being a racist police officer. I assured Gates that I was responding to a citizen’s call to the Cambridge Police and that the caller was outside as we spoke. Gates seemed to ignore me and picked up a cordless telephone and dialed an unknown telephone number. As he did so, I radioed on channel I that I was off in the residence with someone who appeared to be a resident but very uncooperative. I then overheard Gates asking the person on the other end of his telephone call to “get the chief’ and “whats the chiefs name?’. Gates was telling the person on the other end of the call that he was dealing with a racist police officer in his home. Gates then turned to me and told me that I had no idea who I was “messing” with and that I had not heard the last of it. While I was led to believe that Gates was lawfully in the residence, I was quite surprised and confused with the behavior he exhibited toward me. I asked Gates to provide me with photo identification so that I could verify that he resided at Ware Street and so that I could radio my findings to ECC. Gates initially refused, demanding that I show him identification but then did supply me with a Harvard University identification card. Upon learning that Gates was affiliated with Harvard, I radioed and requested the presence of the Harvard University Police.
With the Harvard University identification in hand, I radioed my findings to ECC on channel two and prepared to leave. Gates again asked for my name which I began to provide. Gates began to yell over my spoken words by accusing me of being a racist police officer and leveling threats that he wasn’t someone to mess with. At some point during this exchange, I became aware that Off. Carlos Figueroa was standing behind me. When Gates asked a third time for my name, I explained to him that I had provided it at his request two separate times. Gates continued to yell at me. I told Gates that I was leaving his residence and that if he had any other questions regarding the matter, I would speak with him outside of the residence.
As I began walking through the foyer toward the front door, I could hear Gates agai,n demanding my name. I again told Gates that I would speak with him outside. My reason for wanting to leave the residence was that Gates was yelling very loud and the acoustics of the kitchen and foyer were making it difficult for me to transmit pertinent information to ECC or other responding units. His reply was “ya, I’ll speak with your mama outside”. When I left the residence, I noted that there were several Cambridge and Harvard University police officers assembled on the sidewalk in front of the residence. Additionally, the caller, md at least seven unidentified passers-by were looking in the direction of Gates, who had followed me outside of the residence.
As I descended the stairs to the sidewalk, Gates continued to yell at me, accusing me of racial bias and continued to tell me that I had not heard the last of him. Due to the tumultuous manner Gates had exhibited in his residence as well as his continued tumultuous behavior outside the residence, in view of the public, I warned Gates that he was becoming disorderly. Gates ignored my warning and continued to yell, which drew the attention of both the police officers and citizens, who appeared surprised and alarmed by Gates’s outburst. For a second time I warned Gates to calm down while I withdrew my department issued handcuffs from their carrying case. Gates again ignored my warning and continued to yell at me. It was at this time that I informed Gates that he was under arrest. I then stepped up the stairs, onto the porch and attempted to place handcuffs on Gates. Gates initially resisted my attempt to handcuff him, yelling that he was “disabled” and would fall without his cane. After the handcuffs were property applied, Gates complained that they were too tight. I ordered Off. Ivey, who was among the responding officers, to handcuff Gates with his arms in front of him for his comfort while I secured a cane for Gates from within the residence. I then asked Gates if he would like an officer to take possession of his house key and secure his front door, which he left wide open. Gates told me that the door was un securable due to a previous break attempt at the residence. Shortly thereafter, a Harvard University maintenance person arrived on scene and appeared familiar with Gates. I asked Gates if he was comfortable with this Harvard University maintenance person securing his residence. He told me that he was.
After a brief consultation with Sgt. Lashley and upon Gates’s request, he was transported to 125 6th. Street in a police cruiser (Car 1, Off’s Graham and Ivey) where he was booked and processed by Off. J. P. Crowley.
As a learned Harvard professor I applaud Prof. Gates restraint by choosing not to quote the great poet Gibson during this ugly episode by inquiring as to the responding officer’s potential Jewish heritage. Prof. Gates is someone we could all learn a lesson from.
For my part, I sympathize with Professor Gates consternation. He was obviously concerned that his treatment would mirror that of other black men in this country. Perhaps he feared that he would be thrown into a position of immense responsibility and power for which he was completely unqualified. Imagine his terror! What without a teleprompter and all. Shiver.
July 22, 2009 at 3:17 pm
Perhaps he feared that he would be thrown into a position of immense responsibility and power for which he was completely unqualified. Imagine his terror! What without a teleprompter and all. Shiver.Perhaps he feared that he would be thrown into a position of immense responsibility and power for which he was completely unqualified. Imagine his terror! What without a teleprompter and all. Shiver.
Your bitterness over losing an election to President Obama makes your childish snark and wrongness about this incident all the more enjoyable.
Charges were dropped. Boo hoo for you, you big ninny.
July 22, 2009 at 6:23 pm
Often officers will arrest a beligerent subject to "clear the scene". It's obvious the a clear communication with the subject was impossible due to the ranting. Removing the subject removes the audience that they are appealing to and calms the situation. Dropping the charges would be completely normal in this situation since the "arrest" was simply a tool to regain control of the situation.
July 23, 2009 at 11:59 am
It's perfectly plausible for police dept to decline to file charges against a well-known member of the community for chickenscratch – even if the chickenscratch was potentially subject to fines or whatever. Gates, acc to another story, had just come home from a trip. Maybe he had a meltdown as much because he was tired as anything else. If a large part of his reputation is built on writing about racism, it's no surprise that'd be the first thing on his mind when he got angry at the police officer. I wonder why his neighbor called the police on him, though?
S. Murphy
July 23, 2009 at 11:59 am
It's perfectly plausible for police dept to decline to file charges against a well-known member of the community for chickenscratch – even if the chickenscratch was potentially subject to fines or whatever. Gates, acc to another story, had just come home from a trip. Maybe he had a meltdown as much because he was tired as anything else. If a large part of his reputation is built on writing about racism, it's no surprise that'd be the first thing on his mind when he got angry at the police officer. I wonder why his neighbor called the police on him, though?
S. Murphy
July 23, 2009 at 4:32 pm
Oh my goodness. The tension here is a little much, on both sides! We only have the facts, which some of you might not believe to be actual facts. Can we agree that the officer was responding to a request made by a woman? (Meaning, this police officer wasn't just looking for some minority to harass) Can we agree that the man could have just showed his ID and cleared up the confusion? (Meaning, both men are responsible for their own behavior and the outcome) Sure, we don't know whether the officer involved is racist or not, but there were other people on the scene who were probably watching pretty closely to see if the officer wasn't being honorable. Their vigilance is good because officers should be held accountable, but sad because often officers are good men who are treated as if they're not because of the small group of officers who have made bad choices…*They are viewed like some people now view priests.* Why is it so difficult to believe that most men and women in service positions, like teachers, priests, and officers, try to do their best and are not just out to get the public?
July 23, 2009 at 6:10 pm
"As a learned Harvard professor I applaud Prof. Gates restraint by choosing not to quote the great poet Gibson during this ugly episode by inquiring as to the responding officer's potential Jewish heritage."
True. But had he simply said "What are you looking at, Sugartits?" I think everyone would have shared hearty laugh.
As for our Anonymous friend: Charges were dropped. Boo hoo for you, you big ninny.
Much like the charges against the Black Panthers intimidating voters. I'm beginning to see a pattern.
July 25, 2009 at 7:41 pm
A follow up. Damian Thompson over at the Telegraph reports:
"It has also emerged that Sgt Crowley has taught a racial profiling class at the Lowell Police Academy in Boston for five years with a black colleague and was handpicked by a senior black officer for the role."
Prez Obama has backtracked on his stupid remarks. The fervent support of Officer Crowley's black and white colleagues should prompt a meaningful public apology from both Prof. Gates and the President. The limp words Obama offered yesterday are hardly enough to repair the damage to Sgt. Crowley's reputation.
July 27, 2009 at 9:42 pm
Gates is the racist!!!