In the last few years, pro-lifers have made more progress than probably in the twenty years that came before it. And the reason that that pro-life forces failed to make significant progress over those years is because many pro-lifers were not in interested in progress.
Progress, by its nature, is an iterative thing. You make a small imperfect gain, a step in the right direction. Then you get a good night’s sleep and try to make another small and imperfect step in the right direction. You do this enough times and you make real significant progress. In the case of the pro-life cause, progress means less dead babies.
And the reason pro-lifers are succeeding now is because of tactics. Groups like the SBA list and Live Action are every day trying to make small imperfect gains anywhere and everywhere they can. A sonogram law here, a fetal pain bill there, and a video discrediting the sainted abortion industry. These things all add up, they all chip away at abortion on demand.
These small battles and victories are called tactics. Tactics are how you win the war.
But there remains a segment of pro-lifers who disdain tactics in favor of some false sense of purity. You know them, they are the folks who refuse to vote for imperfect candidates who promote imperfect policies.
Just today, I see some Catholic bloggers decrying Paul Ryan’s statement on abortion last night in the debate. “See, I told you he was not really pro-life like me!” They say this because while Ryan stated that he is pro-life and believes that all life begins at conception, the Romney administration policy would be to pursue legislation with the exceptions for rape, incest, and life of the mother. Cue the vapors.
What these people pretend not to understand is that legislation (aka policy) without those exceptions has 0% chance of getting approved while legislation (aka policy) with those exceptions is much more acceptable to the voting public and thus has a greater chance of enactment. That may be a shame, but it is also reality.
So the pro-lifers who understand that if today you settle for just a piece of the pie and then tomorrow you can come back for more, they understand this tactic. Save as many babies as you can today and tomorrow come back and try to save the rest.
But there are those who will claim that you lose any claim to pro-life if you dirty yourself with such tactics. If we can’t save all the babies at once, we won’t save any. Yeah, that’ll show them.
Listen, if today all we can do is try to save 99% of the babies, we do it. Tomorrow we try to save the rest. But you can’t win a war in one decisive battle, you win it with tactical legislative victories even if they are not perfect. Liberals and secularists have been eating our lunch for generations because they understand this. It took them a century to get to Obamacare. It took Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid to get to Obamacare. And they are not satisfied yet, but they take the victory and keep moving on.
Now that some pro-lifers have learned this lesson, we are beginning to see some real progress. But there are still those who must remain perfect and unsullied, even if babies continue to die. These people are moral masturbators, sure it feels good but accomplishes nothing.
October 13, 2012 at 4:52 pm
Pardon me, I meant Andrew.
October 13, 2012 at 10:20 pm
Patrick,
The problem I have with the Romney position is not that I believe it to be a compromise on life. I would accept such a tactic even if it was loosely enforced initially. The problem I have with the Romney position is that it is Romney's. Romney will say what ever it takes to be elected. Just watch the Kennedy debate. Romney is simply not credible.
fxr2
October 14, 2012 at 3:43 am
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
October 15, 2012 at 12:00 am
Mary: Ryan said that he personally believes in banning abortion, but would support Romney's policies which would allow abortion in most circumstances. Essentially, he believes that abortion is murder but won't fight it because his boss doesn't want him to. I don't like that. The whole reason that the Republican Party has ignored us for the past few decades, throwing us bones every now and then but mostly keeping the status quo, is because the pro-life movement has locked itself in to supporting Republicans and made it quite clear that we won't stop supporting them no matter what they do. They won't respect us if we keep supporting them when they allow funding for Planned Parenthood to pass, they'll only listen to us when we make it clear that we'll punish them for not listening. As for voting third party, I feel no need to vote for a guy just because of his party. I didn't vote for the Republicans in 2008 (or any election with the exception of 2000), and never had any intention of voting for them now, so is my vote really against Romney? If anything it's against Obama, since I (regrettably) voted for him in 2008 although I had no intention of ever voting for him this time around. Claiming that third party voting is evil is a good way to keep the status quo, and right now that's not working out very well for us is it?
Steve: I am not a southerner, nor do I have any sympathy for the Confederacy or desire for another civil war. I am from New Jersey. Therefore, your "neo-antebellum" attitude doesn't really work for me. I have no desire to kill anyone, even abortionists, and would much prefer to settle this politically.
October 15, 2012 at 2:20 am
"Would much prefer to settle this politically". Andrew, we have been "trying to settle this politically" for the last four decades. We have won battles, but we have lost the war. The unelected establishment that runs this country at the federal level has beat us in the long run every time. The only way to defeat them is to purge the Catholic church of it's liberal leadership in the clergy and laity, start a massive campaign to convince our fellow Americans that an abortionist is as evil as a child molester, and overturn abortion laws at the state level and back it up with force. The Federal government won't like it, but it doesn't care about what real Americans want anyway, so why bother. The Dem's and the GOP don't care either. The Dem's despise us, and the 'conservative' GOP ignores us between elections. Yet like an abused woman who thinks her husband or boyfriend will 'get better', we keep crawling back to the abuser(s). The Catholic hierarchy, (especially people like Abp. Dolan) are pathetic in the way they whine about our rights being violated by Obama and the Dem's, Hey, many in the hierarchy got into bed with the Demo's in the 30's, and they wanted this 'social justice' really bad, so now they're bawling about Bamy shafting us? And Dolan still wants the Socialist-In-Chief at that stupid dinner? So Andrew, I ask again, how well is 'politics as usual'working out for us?
October 15, 2012 at 5:06 pm
I think that we agree here, Scott, at least for the most part. I agree that we have to foster orthodoxy in the parts of the Church that have gone off the proverbial rails on issues like abortion and foster respect for life in our country which has forgotten what that means. I also agree that we have to overturn laws at the state as well as federal level (which is what I meant by "settle this politically," as opposed to the violent solution you seemed to be advocating). I agree that neither party is the answer, and I've said already that I don't trust the Republicans on this any more than I do the Democrats.
Social justice is not a bad thing. It is a necessary thing and an extension of our obligation to charity and compassion. Read Rerum Novarum, and you'll see that it goes much further back than the New Deal (which wasn't about abortion, or even "welfare" which wasn't even thought of yet). We don't have to support every program, but we can't overlook our obligation to the poor simply because we don't think that they're "worthy" enough to merit it. Pope Benedict, in his encyclical Caritas in Veritate, said that access to healthcare is a universal human right. Regardless of how you feel about our current healthcare system, that human right is not being met when people can't even go to the doctor because it will cost a significant part of their paycheck just to walk through the door. The fact that Obama used "social justice" Catholics to undermine the Church doesn't speak against the concept of social justice, it speaks against those Catholics who focused on one part of the Church's teachings and ignored the rest.
I'm personally glad that Obama is coming to the Al Smith dinner. The dinner is not supposed to be partisan (and will be destroyed if it becomes a campaign dinner for Romney), it benefits Catholic Charities (which is an irony that will hopefully not be lost on Obama), and perhaps it might even show Obama what he is trying to destroy and give him a road toward repentance. We do, after all, want him to repent, right? We aren't Jonah when he refused to convert Nineveh out of a desire for their destruction, are we? Closing ourselves off from anybody who disagrees with us is a good way to be ignored, as well as a very bad way to evangelize.
October 15, 2012 at 7:56 pm
Mary, you let Republican propaganda get the best of you. Those of us who have paid attention since the 1980s know the pro-life cause is not helped by electing those liars.