Patrick & Matthew Archbold  ·  Published since 2005 Wednesday, 11 November 2026

Creative
Minority Report

We Laugh Because We Believe

Set in two inks Black for the argument. Red for everything the Church already answered.

Maybe Sneaky Medieval Monks Are Innocent.

For decades, if you went to pretty much any university, opened up a mainstream textbook, or listened to the self-appointed experts in academia, you were told that writings of first-century Jewish historian Flavius Josephus was a fraud. Or at least, that it was heavily doctored.

Why did they say that? Well, think about it. Josephus wasn’t a Christian. He was a Jewish historian writing in Rome around the year 93 AD. Christians were not very popular around then. Yet, in his book Antiquities of the Jews, he writes about Jesus. He mentions his execution by Pontius Pilate. He mentions his followers. And he even refers to Jesus as “the Christ.”

Now, the modern academic consensus has always been that there’s no way a Jewish man writing for Rome would write that. So they invented the sneaky medieval monks. When in doubt, blame those sneaky medieval monks. They said the heretofore unknown sneaky medieval monks forged those lines and slipped them into the text. Case closed. Move along. Nothing to see here.
Except…what if the experts were wrong? Again.

Everything was fine up until a scholar named T. C. Schmidt at Fairfield University, actually did some research. He looked at the exact Greek vocabulary, the sentence structure, and the word frequencies across all of Josephus’s writings. And it turns out, every single word of that controversial passage matches Josephus’s writing style. In short, not a forgery. Not a sloppy cut-and-paste job by sneaky medieval monks. It’s Josephus.

This is big news. Really big. It’s extra-biblical evidence of Christ in the first century.

There’s some really interesting things going on by this professor. For instance, the Greek word that gets translated into English as “miracles” actually means something closer to “paranormal deeds.” Josephus was writing as someone who didn’t quite know what to make of Jesus. He wrote as someone unsure if these powers were divine or something else entirely.

Also, when Josephus mentions the resurrection, he’s reporting what Jesus’s followers claimed happened, not necessarily signing on as a believer himself. And remember: Josephus came from the exact Jerusalem priestly circles that were directly involved in Jesus’s trial. He had access to the people who were actually there.

Naturally, the establishment won’t give up without a fight. But this is yuuuuge news.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *