The media is already painting Ketanji Brown Jackson as apolitical and/or a centrist. Don’t believe it for a second. I know you didn’t but she’s up to her eyeball in NARAL and she’s made insanely partisan decisions from the bench.
Here’s what you need to know. The Souther Poverty Law Center, the ACLU, and Planned Parenthood all think she’s the bomb. That’s all I need to know.
The SBA List pointed out that “In 2001, in McGuire v. Reilly, Jackson co-authored an amicus brief supporting a Massachusetts law that created a floating “buffer zone” to prevent pro-life sidewalk counselors from approaching to speak with women outside of abortion facilities. Jackson’s clients included NARAL, the Women’s Bar Association of Massachusetts, the League of Women Voters, and the Abortion Access Project of Massachusetts. NARAL and the pro-abortion National Women’s Law Center strongly supported her nomination to the D.C. Circuit.”
Yes. This radical wanted to make it illegal for pro-lifers to even approach people walking into abortion clinics. Why? Because you weirdo religious cult types have no rights. And in fact, the elites have the right to not even see you.
Before she joined the court, Jackson worked as an openly progressive attorney and Obama appointee to the United States Sentencing Commission, where she was committed to forwarding the leftist agenda. More than two decades ago, the Breyer apprentice penned an amicus brief for the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), and other organizations that kill babies in the womb, in support of a Democrat-backed law that prevented pro-life protesters from congregating outside abortion facilities.
As a result of her work, Jackson has earned the favor of several pro-abortion, pro-LGBT, anti-religious liberty activist groups including The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, which is composed of problematic organizations including the radical Southern Poverty Law Center, the increasingly anti-free-speech American Civil Liberties Union, and Planned Parenthood.
In contrast to how they treated Trump’s Supreme Court nominees, members of the corrupt press are already painting Jackson as an “apolitical” and “historic” choice who should be confirmed by the Democrat-controlled Senate.
Democrat legislators have already expressed their support for any Biden pick as long the nominee will combat “white supremacy” and vote to uphold Roe v. Wade in the court’s upcoming decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
“I’m looking for someone who’s going to be not only highly qualified, as all of the people that you already talked about are, but who really brings to the judiciary the kind of diversity that I’d like, that — someone who will consider the impact, the effects of whatever decision-making is on people in our country, so that they’re not making decisions just based on, which I would like them to base it on, law, which would be nice, and precedent, and who are not eagerly trying to get rid of decades of precedent that would protect a woman’s right to choose, for example, and voting rights, etc.,” Democrat Sen. Mazie Hirono, a Senate Judiciary Committee member, said last month.”
