Hot women are pro-life. Hey,it’s not me saying it. It’s the New York Times. And oddly enough they don’t seem thrilled about it.
Doing her best imitation of the Wicked Queen from Snow White, Gail Collins screeches in her latest NY Times column that she’s a bit perturbed that pro-life women are all young and beautiful.
“Planned Parenthood aids and abets the sexual abuse and prostitution of minors,” announced Lila Rose, the beautiful anti-abortion activist who led the project. The right wing is currently chock-full of stunning women who want to end their gender’s right to control their own bodies. Homely middle-aged men are just going to have to find another sex to push around.
Awww. Frumpy aging hispters are getting a little angry at pretty pro-lifers. Let’s make this clear, the pro-life movement is chock-full of stunning women who don’t want a bunch of frumpy middle-aged hags telling them what freedom means. They know that freedom starts with life. That’s what makes the pro-aborts angry.
They’ve seen the effects of your utopian vision and have rejected it. Feminists are perturbed because posterity has kicked them in the posterior. I understand that it must be difficult for all those bra-burning Woodstock wanna-bes to see a new generation come along and say they were wrong. It’s no wonder they get all “I’ll get you my pretty” on beautiful young pro-lifers.
Have you seen the March for Life? So many young, vibrant and beautiful people, their eyes full of hope and smiles on their faces. It’s inspiring to most, except if you see their beauty, hope, and optimism as a threat like Gail Collins clearly does.
I almost want to start a calendar or something just to to tweak the hags. We could call it the “Women of Extremism” Calendar. That’ll really get them going.
Word of advice to Lila Rose: don’t accept any apples from New York Times columnists.