She’s not a biologist, after all.
SEN. BLACKBURN: "Can you provide a definition of the word 'woman'?"
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) March 23, 2022
JACKSON: "No, I can't"
BLACKBURN: "You can't?"
JACKSON: "I'm not a biologist" pic.twitter.com/i7Rg83z5Y4
What madness is this? Wokeness has won. This is it spiking the ball.
A Supreme Court nominee says she can’t define what a “woman” is and Democrats accept this and Republicans are too scared to mock it. That’s how I know woke has won.
The funny thing is that she says she’s not a biologist so she couldn’t answer. The funny thing is that if you’re talking about science it’s really really easy to answer this question. Start with XX chromosones and end with looks nice in a sundress.
I despise how we talk about women today such as talking about “bleeders.” What a disgusting way to talk about women.
March 23, 2022 at 9:17 pm
I’m not a biologist either but I do remember the Biology 101 thing with XX and XY chromosomes.
March 23, 2022 at 10:40 pm
Only Catholics and Jews ever end up on the SCOTUS….so which one is she?
March 24, 2022 at 7:41 pm
I was all ready to say biologists have rigidly defined taxonomies that all trace back to genetics. Its the cornerstone of evolutionary biology. But, you beat me to it… I guess to us “unenlightened” the science is clear. I wonder why they don’t ‘follow’ it.