Hey, what happened to “first, do no harm?”

Alright folks, step right up into the cosmic funhouse of modern state-sanctioned morality, because this one will make your soul shudder and your hair stand on end.

LifeNews.com: A Quebec physicians’ group is again promoting euthanasia for newborn babies, saying euthanasia can be an “appropriate treatment” for infants with severe disabilities or malformations even though Canadian law still forbids the practice and a baby cannot consent.

The Collège des médecins du Québec, or Quebec College of Physicians, told the Daily Mail it “reiterates that medical assistance in dying may be an appropriate treatment for babies suffering from extreme pain that cannot be relieved and who have severe malformations or serious polysymptomatic syndromes that destroy any prospect of survival.”

“The CMQ believes that parents should have the opportunity to obtain this care for their infant under these well-defined circumstances,” the college said.

That is a proposal, not the law. Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying program, legalized in 2016, applies to adults 18 and older who request it and meet eligibility rules. It does not authorize doctors to euthanize newborns. Yet.


Yeah, you heard that right! Infants! Tiny, vulnerable little souls who haven’t even had the chance to figure out how their own hands work, let alone sign a consent form, are now being slated for the ultimate medical “exit strategy.”

They told the Daily Mail, with the flat, antiseptic detachment that only a bureaucracy can master that medical assistance in dying could be an “appropriate treatment” for babies experiencing extreme pain, severe malformations, or syndromes that “destroy any prospect of survival.”

They’re framing it as compassion, right? An act of mercy!

But let’s pull back the curtain on the linguistic magic trick here. When we start categorizing the ending of an infant’s life as a standard treatment option, we’re stepping straight out of traditional medical ethics and diving headfirst into a dark, utilitarian dystopia.

Now, look, let’s be clear: this isn’t the law yet. Right now, Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) program, which kicked off in 2016, is strictly for adults 18 and over who can actually ask for it. But notice how these institutional boundaries always seem to stretch? It starts with “autonomous adult choice,” and bit by bit, the state apparatus and medical authorities push the goalposts until we’re talking about ending the lives of those who literally have zero agency or voice.

What does it say about a culture when the apparatus of healthcare shifts its focus from relentless, loving care for the most fragile among us to measuring the ‘prospects’ of a human life before deciding whether to pull the plug? It’s terrifying. We’ve got to ask ourselves if we are moving toward genuine human empathy, or are we just streamlining the management of human suffering until life itself becomes conditional?

We’re all dying. Some people in power just want to help it happen sooner…y’know before you become a drain on the economy.