A Supreme Court nominee actually said she couldn’t define the term “woman” because she’s not a biologist. Because of this, I have some questions.
So if we can’t define what a woman is, how do we know that they only earn 77 cents for every dollar a man earns.
Couldn’t we just extrapolate the definition of a woman by saying, “not a man.” Or can we not define “man” either. If we can’t define “man” how do we know they’re toxic?
If we don’t know what a woman is, why is it so important that we get a woman on the bench.
Joe Biden nominated a woman. Is he a biologist?
So, should all the “Women’s Studies” in all the colleges across the country now be run out of the biology department?
Instead of calling women something offensive like “bleeders,” couldn’t we just call them really slow swimmers?
Wasn’t it bad enough that the “party of science” couldn’t define what a “human” is, now they can’t even define what a woman is? Is this really progress?
Should Justice Ketanji Brown recuse herself from any cases involving women or gender since she doesn’t know who these so called “women” are?
