Headline “Nearly Half of Voters Disapprove of Obama’s Handling of Libya Attacks”
That means half the population still doesn’t know what happened in Benghazi and afterward or they would disapprove as well.
While some of the MSM are beginning to ask hard questions, they are still few and far between. This bold-faced lie of a coverup is the real deal. If this was anybody but Obama, heads would have rolled already.
The revelations coming out of the hearings on Capitol hill boggle the mind. Key administration officials including Susan Rice, Jay Carney, Sec. Clinton, and even the President himself bold-faced lied to the American people and there is abundant video to prove it. This went on for weeks and this is still not front page news on many newspapers.
These people, these negligent liars for political expediency who spit on the graves of brave dead Americans and their aiders and abettors in the media are some of the most craven and despicable people I have ever had the misfortune to witness.
I am sick to my stomach over this whole thing. There shouldn’t even be an election.
God help this country of mine. Please.
October 11, 2012 at 5:55 am
Isn't it awful? It's been a month now. Where's the outrage?
October 11, 2012 at 6:21 am
Of course there should be an election. But Pres. Obama should not be on the ballot because he SHOULD be impeached!
October 11, 2012 at 3:37 pm
They are desperate. I believe the sycophants are doubling down. More at http://www.rantingcatholicmom.blogspot.com (Beware the Sycophants.)
I mention this entry because apparently no one has read it, even though my reader stats are higher than usual. Are any other bloggers seeing the same thing?
October 11, 2012 at 3:42 pm
The real NFL officials are back!
October 11, 2012 at 6:22 pm
There shouldn't even be an election.
Now you are getting it. This should be followed by, there shouldn't even be a war- given that the same fruitcakes the uninformed masses vote in prosecute these wars, so we end up in impossible situations.
There is a more frightening possibility- even if you could somehow get the uninformed to understand clearly what happened, they still may prefer Obama.
I think the founding fathers were sensible when they restricted voting to property owners- they've got the stuff that will be taxed, and they've got the stuff that needs to be defended, so the likelihood government will get out hand while they are in charge is low. Universal suffrage brought in the rule of the bureaucrat, the demise of the private property, and this aimless imperialism because bureaucrats only have access to the cookie jar for a limited time, so they steal all they can now, do everything they can to expand their reach, and you can just forget about saving anything for the future. This looks reasonable to the voter who has no property, because they think the purpose of government is to take from a person who has in order to give to one who does not have. It is doubtful they will understand, even after they are starving and there is nothing left, just how bad this process is.