This is Part 2 of my weeklong interview with Ann Barnhardt in which we discuss whether Hillary Clinton should be hung or put against a wall and shot.
PA: The fact that you call on Justice Scalia to resign seems to mean that you think the time reforming the federal government from the inside has passed and that good Catholic people can no longer in good conscience support this unconstitutional tyranny. Is this correct?
AB: Absolutely. Justice Scalia painted himself into a corner with his dissent in which he made clear that he fully appreciates the gravity and enormity of the situation vis-a-vis the Washington DC regime. I have an axiom, which I refer to as The Barnhardt Axiom. The Barnhardt Axiom states that seeking and/or holding public office, especially national-level public office, is today, in and of itself, proof that a given person is psychologically and morally unfit to hold public office. Sitting on the Supreme Court is a public office. The Barnhardt Axiom applies to both elected and unelected office, and can even be mapped at this late hour onto both the United States Military and the entirety of the Federal Bureaucracy. It all comes down to my insistence upon logical consistency and operating from the starting point of a true base premise. Namely, if one sees and understands that the Constitution is no longer in force and has no meaning, in fact that no law as written has any meaning in and of itself, how can one possibly continue engage and ratify by participation that which claims to yet be the very thing that it overthrew and destroyed? If John Smith rapes, beheads and eats Thomas Jones, can John Smith simply declare himself to BE Thomas Jones, and thus no crime has occurred? Each day that Justice Scalia continues to participate in the farce, he is calling John Smith “Thomas Jones”, while happily taking his $20k monthly salary from his new master, John Smith.
But Scalia is by no means alone. I continue to watch aghast as the pundit class, even on the so-called “far right” persists in treating the Washington DC paradigm as a legitimate matrix worthy of discussion and engagement, even after reporting day in and day out one new proof set after another that the putsch regime has raped, beheaded and eaten the Constitutional Republic of the United States. For example, Hillary Clinton’s ever-growing list of high crimes are reported every single day. Hillary Clinton is a murderous, lying, cheating, larcenous, traitorous psychopath. Therefore, how can the question possibly be whether or not Hillary Clinton should be President of the (former) United States? What in the hell is the matter with you people, at long last? Can you not see the glaring insanity of the very premise?
I’ll tell you right now what the real question is, and when this question starts being asked publicly, then I will sit up and pay attention, and dare to hope again: The question is whether or not, after arrest, a speedy trial and conviction of crimes against humanity, Hillary Clinton should be offered the sacraments and then hung, or put against a wall and shot. The answer, of course, is that she should be put against a wall and shot, and then her body should be hung on public display so that any other aspiring psychopath oligarchs can see how a just, Christian society deals with their ilk. Sadly, this would first require the organization and declaration of of a replacement government, which simply is not going to happen due to the aforementioned effeminacy and pathological indifference of the populace. Removal – and by removal I mean execution – of the existing psychopathic political class outside of an organized, legitimate replacement government would be anarchy and would result in the advent of an even worse tyranny than what we have now. And since justice demands these people be executed, and their unquenchable malignancy can only be stopped by execution, post-modern, post-Christian culture finds itself utterly incapable of even the slightest self-correction.