He is the only guy left who can make a run at this. No candidate is perfect, but Santorum is the best of the bunch by a long shot this time around. Every other candidate has had their turn in the spotlight, all but one. But maybe that can still change.
Maggie Gallagher at NRO reports
Rick Santorum has snagged two big “gets” in the Iowa caucuses, the endorsements of Bob Vander Plaats and Focus on the Family state policy council head Chuck Hurley.
Hurley appears to be asking Perry and Bachmann to step down to unite behind Santorum. Chutzpah?
and Lowry adds
Santorum has had a major chicken-and-egg problem. I get the impression social conservatives in Iowa have been leery of supporting him because he’s been so low in the polls, meaning he stays low in the polls. He’s always needed something to give him an initial boost of plausibility. Maybe this is it, but who knows? I tend to believe one of the three, Perry, Bachmann, or Santorum, is going to get a big boost at the end. Here, by the way, is Walter Shapiro on why Santorum is more impressive on the stump than Perry.
It is true that plausibility is a key concern, but if Santorum can surprise in Iowa and one of the other more conservative also-rans calls it quits, Santorum could still make a run at this as the alternative.
Santorum is smart, experienced, and as solidly pro-life as you are likely to find. He is a good and decent man and he is qualified. Now more than ever, conservatives need to get behind Rick Santorum, before its too late.
December 23, 2011 at 12:40 am
I could never hope to have a "comeback" to YOU, Don.
Well, I guess Paul and Don do share uh, no letters, so I can see how you'd be confused.
December 23, 2011 at 1:26 am
Ooops, my bad, ya got me, Paul. How could I have made such a mistake?
December 23, 2011 at 3:13 pm
Hey Paul, didn't you read that article? I don't think so. Well, I do hope that the more intellectually honest among the CMR readers will take a look at that article and see the real Ron Paul, instead of the fantasy one made up by the dymanic duo of McCleary/Zummo.
December 23, 2011 at 3:53 pm
Steve obviously didn't read the article I posted, because there one learns that the "fantasy" picture of Ron Paul is quite real, and it's not so spectacular.
December 24, 2011 at 5:36 pm
To those readers of CMR who are intellectally honest, read this answer to the Paul is a racist smear at http://takimagmag.com/article/why_the_beltway_libertarians__are_trying_to_smear_ron_paul/#azxxSXLIprk No one who reads these comments in context can honestly believe the "racism" smear.
December 25, 2011 at 2:02 am
Curious how those NR types who smear Ron Paul as racist are stony silent on the truly racist comments made by WF Buckley, one of their Neocon hee-roes.
December 27, 2011 at 7:01 pm
Last summer I circulated petitions to be elected Republican committee member. I still have my circulation list and I went to Rick's site and volunteered to pound the pavement, write letters to the editor and help with other assorted tasks.
I hope he takes me up on it. Virginia shows that you need boots on the ground, and Ron Paul seems to have enough loony-bin refugees to "get 'er done" 😉