This is easily the most sickening political story of recent memory.
This story has gotten a lot of play the last few days. Obama stuck a prayer written on a piece of paper in the Western Wall. It was a big photo-op and the media played the clip over and over showing the unwashed how prayerful, religious and Christian Obama actually is.
The following day, however, the contents of his prayer were published by an Israeli newspaper. The prayer read “Lord – Protect my family and me. Forgive me my sins, and help me guard against pride and despair. Give me the wisdom to do what is right and just. And make me an instrument of your will.”
A nice little prayer, right?
According to the press, it was pulled from the wall by a student and leaked to the press. The rabbi who supervises Jerusalem’s Western Wall condemned the removal of a prayer note, saying the action was “sacrilegious.”
Rabbi Shmuel Rabinowitz, who supervises the Western Wall said, “This sacrilegious action deserves sharp condemnation and represents a desecration of the holy site. Notes placed in the Western Wall are between the person and his Maker. Heaven forbid one should read or use them.”
But news from the Israeli Insider may prove that the “leak” may have been intentional.
What initially seemed to be a journalistic scoop of dubious moral propriety now seems to be a case of an Israeli paper being played by the Barack Obama campaign. Maariv, the second most popular newspaper in Israel, was roundly criticized for publishing the note Obama left in the Kotel. But now a Maariv spokesperson says that publication of the note was pre-approved for international publication by the Obama campaign, leading to the conclusion that the “private” prayer was intentionally leaked for public consumption.
This is sickening. This prayer was not to God at all but to the media. Hey Obama, remember this from the gospels?
Take care not to perform righteous deeds in order that people may see them; otherwise, you will have no recompense from your heavenly Father.
When you give alms, do not blow a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets to win the praise of others. Amen, I say to you, they have received their reward.
But when you give alms, do not let your left hand know what your right is doing, so that your almsgiving may be secret. And your Father who sees in secret will repay you.
When you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, who love to stand and pray in the synagogues and on street corners so that others may see them. Amen, I say to you, they have received their reward.
But when you pray, go to your inner room, close the door, and pray to your Father in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will repay you.
Looks like Obama skipped that part of the Bible. I can’t imagine this is going to fly well with Jews. The Israel Insider newsmagazine observed:
“If the Maariv statement about pre-approval of publication of the note is true, it would mean that the Obama campaign had managed the event brilliantly, if deceptively, getting the double benefit of appearing to be victimized by the invasive Israeli press and [a] prayer-thieving Jew while at the same time leaking out his humble Christian plea to the Lord.”
And to many Christians this kind of deception in praying for his family and ironically to guard against the sin of pride and only doing it for the press attention is sickening.
Now you just watch. While Obama praying at the wall received tons of coverage this latest round of news will be buried. Perhaps the Rabbi Shmuel Rabinowitz’s words are more apropos for Obama rather than the young man or the newspaper. “This sacrilegious action deserves sharp condemnation and represents a desecration of the holy site. Notes placed in the Western Wall are between the person and his Maker. Heaven forbid one should read or use them.” Looks like Obama used it for his own purposes. But where’s the denunciation?
But this fits into exactly who I believe Obama is. His prayers are poll-driven rather than sincere. They are not whispered but spoken with a bullhorn. They are to voters and not to God. They are simply not prayers at all.
July 29, 2008 at 5:03 pm
And soon enough, we’ll be forced to pray TO him. It’s just preparing us for the inevitable.
Swear by the genius of Obama, burn a pinch of incense, and curse the Christ.
July 29, 2008 at 5:34 pm
When I first read this story on Foxnews, I immediately felt it was not an authentic prayer of Obama’s but his playing to the media. What a fake!
July 29, 2008 at 6:33 pm
Didn’t John Paul put a prayer in the wall that was also made public? This isn’t even a question of wanting to make it public. It is more along the lines of not caring whether your privacy is respected or not. Like having the press film you watch your daughter play soccer. A bit strange but that is politics.
July 29, 2008 at 7:44 pm
Obama didn’t say the prayer was public. He let the world think it was stolen from the wall.
July 29, 2008 at 8:02 pm
It is getting nearly impossible to keep up with all the bull manure, lies, deceptions, staged events, grandiosity, supine media behavior, and utter sociopathic narcissism of this man and his vast entourage of corporate Maoists.
Somewhere though, a small intuitive whisper says to me…when the regular “Joe/Jane Doe Obama Supporters” get into the voting booth, they will not automatically vote for Barack the Great, or as Mark Shea, I believe, has referred to him as the Living Son of God. There will be a sufficient doubt–that will move their noble, though liberal, hands to vote for anyone but Barack.
Fear of real Divine retribution will make them pause…even those of our own bishops who vote the Democratic Party line–hook and sinker.
July 29, 2008 at 9:06 pm
I’m not sure I understand the issue with Obama publicizing his prayer. Any candidate’s life is made public. Was he not supposed to go to the wall.
It seems you are judging Obama’s faith and aren’t you not supposed to judge not lest ye be judged.
This is because Obama is locked in to win this election and you hard- core Catholics can’t stand it. Obama is going to revolutionize politics. The old divisions to which you cling will be gone. We won’t be one side going after the other. We won’t be red and blue. We’ll all be Americans. Won’t that be nice or are you too clouded by your own prejudices to want a unified country?
July 29, 2008 at 9:29 pm
Obama already believes he is an instrument of God’s will. What an empty yarmulke!
— Mack
July 29, 2008 at 10:25 pm
Paleeze, anonymous!
Matthew — the only thing I would argue with you about is that you say this is ‘easily the most sickening political story of recent memory’. I am sure you haven’t forgotten that he advocates the killing of live infants who by some miracle survice an abortion.
This is what we have to look forward to anonymous. No respect for life and a man who is determined to sign the freedom of choice act and mandate same sex marriage by executive fiat. He would be an abomination.
–L
July 29, 2008 at 11:07 pm
An anonymous wrote: “Obama is going to revolutionize politics. The old divisions to which you cling will be gone. We won’t be one side going after the other. We won’t be red and blue. We’ll all be Americans. Won’t that be nice or …”
This has been said before: “One People, One Reich, One Fuhrer.”
July 29, 2008 at 11:50 pm
L, I didn’t consider the Live Birth Act a political story. This, however, is a story about a political campaign stunt which shines a light on who this man really is.
I will agree that his infanticide vote is the worst and sickest vote I’ve ever seen.
July 30, 2008 at 6:11 am
Ma’ariv is backtracking — from the TNR, who is seeking confirmation and further investigation of the claims:
Ma’ariv spokesman denied that the Obama campaign leaked the memo to them or gave them approval to print it, and who disavowed the alleged spokesman who gave quotes to at least four Israeli publications.
At the risk of beating a dead horse, I’ll be following up with those publications to find out where they got those quotes from. I just spoke with an editor at one of those publications who broached the possibility that Ma’ariv was trying to deflect criticims of it by releasing these spurious rumors about the Obama campaign, but upon realizing that they’ll have to back up those accusations, is now disavowing them. I’ll update here if I get anything interesting from those publications.
I think that Ma’riv, facing an understandable backlash from Israelis (and possible legal repercussions) for this violation of privacy, would try to deflect the blame on the Obama campaign.
The actual note was apparently fished out of the wall by a Jewish seminary student who now repents and has atoned for his theft, the note having been replaced. So the question is how did the contents of the note get to Ma’ariv? — Either they were able to acquire the note from the student prior to its return, OR the contents of the note were distributed before hand by the Obama campaign.
I agree the latter would be a cheap and sacreligious publicity stunt on the part of the campaign, but in fairness I think before we jump to conclusions we let the investigation run its course and see what all the facts are.
July 30, 2008 at 12:58 pm
You’re seriously quoting The New Republic as a credible source for information? You’ve got to do better than that. They’ve been busted so many times for fabricating stories that the National Enquirer mocks them.
July 30, 2008 at 4:30 pm
This comment has been removed by the author.
July 30, 2008 at 4:32 pm
I’m aware of TNR — however, when an anonymous spokesperson made the original claim that the Obama campaign gave explicit approval (but approving no tangible evidence); and then Ma’ariv denying the claim and the spokesperson himself, I have to reconsider.
Likewise, as a reader at TNR pointed out, the Israeli Insider to which Creative Minority report links has itself a questionable record of reporting on Obama (the “Obama is a closet Muslim” smear, and that Obama forged his birth certificate being two stories it has endorsed).
I don’t support Obama and anybody who has read my postings at Catholics in the Public Square will know I oppose him 100% on his very tangible and verifiable position on abortion, but as far as this is concerned, yes, given the circumstances and the source, I think it would be prudent to wait until further verification is made.
Relying on anonymous sources and a lack of response from the Obama campaign is insufficient for mounting such an accusation.