So it would seem the New York Times believes that if you want to make a living you must give up your constitutionally protected rights. I guess because money is dirty and so are those evil Christians…or something.
So it would seem the New York Times believes that if you want to make a living you must give up your constitutionally protected rights. I guess because money is dirty and so are those evil Christians…or something.
© 2024 Creative Minority Report — Powered by WordPress
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑
April 1, 2014 at 12:29 pm
Jack Chick lives!
April 1, 2014 at 1:27 pm
That's a horrible insult to Mr. Chick!
April 1, 2014 at 1:28 pm
I'm getting so tired of saying this – Hobby Lobby already provides coverage for birth control. Their argument is against the morning after pill.
April 1, 2014 at 1:29 pm
Heartless!
April 1, 2014 at 1:51 pm
Mack stole my thunder – Jack Chick immediately came to mind.
April 1, 2014 at 1:56 pm
I thought it was the White House that paid women less than men.
April 1, 2014 at 3:31 pm
So, do I have this right? Religious employers don't have any conscience rights, and companies don't have free speech rights…but when a company puts its money and influence behind "progressive" social causes… and promoting their " corporate values"…which stem from their ummm…" corporate conscience"…The NYT and the rest of the anointed cheer. As, with so many things, it all seems to boil down to "that which we like is compulsory, that which we do not like is forbidden".
April 1, 2014 at 5:10 pm
Are progressives really that stupid?
(No need to answer that).
April 1, 2014 at 5:10 pm
Tyranny. Our basic rights and freedoms are being denied systematically by dictator- states. Civil disobedience is morally required. Catholic bishops and priests ought to be leading people in standing against intrinsically evil laws and policies.
April 1, 2014 at 9:28 pm
The distinction between unconscionable and immoral is more relevant than ever…
April 2, 2014 at 3:46 pm
All of these crazy examples would be struck down under RFRA. So the cartoonist is merely lying.
Before world war II, there was a media campaign that tried to present Jews as evil and a threat to the country. More and more, this anti-religious campaign is starting to look like "The Eternal Jew"
April 2, 2014 at 3:52 pm
Apparently (contra Dr. Edward Peters) evil will be ugly for awhile longer, or perhaps beautifully attractive evil will always be run parallel with it.
http://tinyurl.com/kgb3yct
April 2, 2014 at 5:37 pm
I have never word a word printed in the NYT. I do not plan to start.
April 2, 2014 at 8:51 pm
And yet Hobby Lobby invests in abortion drug companies.
Can you say double standard?
April 2, 2014 at 8:52 pm
I doubt it is keeping the editor up nights.
April 2, 2014 at 8:54 pm
I'd say it is pretty much on the money…..
April 3, 2014 at 2:01 am
Because you're not capable of reasoning or you refuse to employ reason because you don't like to accept objective truth.
April 3, 2014 at 12:49 pm
Reminds me a lot of KKK anti-Catholicism, circa 1920. There is truly nothing new under the sun.
April 3, 2014 at 12:57 pm
Hobby Lobby's problem is with four prescriptions:
Plan B – The "morning after pill"
Ella – The "week after pill"
Mirena (Hormonal) IUD
Paragard (Copper) IUD
Most of the coverage is about Plan B, in part because there is little evidence that it actually is an abortifacient. This fits into the secular meme is that Christians don't believe in science and their concerns can be ignored. However, Plan B is available over the counter, so I'm not sure why this even needs to be covered.
Ella is new and not widely used or prescribed.
The real issue is coverage of the IUD. IUDs have a high upfront cost, but can last for several years. The Administration wants more women to use IUDs. Problem is that it is much more likely that the IUD works as an abortifacient. Neither the Administration nor the media wants to talk about this, so they don't.
April 3, 2014 at 2:00 pm
If the "morning-after" pill is not considered an abortifacient. this can only be argued if one believes that live does not begin until implantation – which it is designed to render impossible.