Patrick & Matthew Archbold  ·  Published since 2005 Wednesday, 30 September 2026

Creative
Minority Report

We Laugh Because We Believe

Set in two inks Black for the argument. Red for everything the Church already answered.

Can We Argue Gender Without Arguing God?

Jason Whitlock doesn’t think the secular left is listening. He believes the problem is that believers are trying to play the “diversity and inclusiveness” game. He’s tired of playing by the left’s ground rules.

He has a point but there’s also a flaw.

I agree with him that we shouldn’t allow the left to set the margins of our debate. However, science is NOT their purview. They claim #science but what they’re actually pushing on us is not science. I think Matt Walsh is smart to just use straight facts to argue the point about gender.

Here’s the thing though. Who on the left is watching Matt Walsh’s documentary? None. They’re enclosed in an impenetrable bubble. But that doesn’t mean we still shouldn’t engage.

But in the end, this is God’s universe or a godless universe. Any debate as fundamental as gender or humanity itself is essentially a debate about God. In the end, in a godless universe there is no truth, no objective truth. In a godless universe, gender is a social construct because everything is a social construct, including God himself.

So I think it’s good to argue on scientific terms but in the end this will always come down to whether one believes in an ordered universe:

Or a chaotic universe:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *