Ohio Senator JD Vance had this to say about the terrible night we had on election night. Things are not going our way. He has thoughts which are worth reading, mainly because I believe many political strategists will agree.
The one that’s going to get all the attention is the advocacy of exceptions to abortion bans. He does say we need to do a better job of making a moral argument but then says we must accept the political reality that people right now want exceptions for rape and incest to abortion bills.
What to do when our strong moral conviction doesn’t line up with political reality? That’s the question. Here’s my quick thought and some of you may not like it. I’m not responsible for the world or the country. I’m responsible for what I vote for. When I die I have to face Jesus and perhaps explain myself a bit. I simply don’t want to have a conversation about my political strategization. (Bonus points for made up word!) I don’t want to equivocate on life.
I get the political realities and all that but I can’t see how it would’ve been helpful for Germans in the 1930’s to say you can’t kill Jews except in cases of this or that. Or how about you can’t have slaves unless in cases where you really really need them.
If we equivocate on this issue, we may win more elections in the short term. May. But if we equivocate on this issue we may lose in the long run.
Anyway here’s the message from JD Vance on Twitter:
For pro lifers, last night was a gut punch. No sugar coating it.
Giving up on the unborn is not an option. It’s politically dumb and morally repugnant. Instead, we need to understand why we lost this battle so we can win the war.
I was very involved in the “no” campaign for issue 1, so let me share a few insights.
First, we got creamed among voters who disliked both Issue 1 and also Ohio’s current law (heartbeat bill). We saw this consistently in polling and in conversations. “I don’t like Issue 1, but I’d rather have that extreme than the other extreme.” This is a political fact, not my opinion.
Second, we have to recognize how much voters mistrust us (meaning elected Republicans) on this issue. Having an unplanned pregnancy is scary. Best case, you’re looking at social scorn and thousands of dollars of unexpected medical bills. We need people to see us as the pro-life party, not just the anti-abortion party.
Third, as Donald Trump has said, “you’ve got to have the exceptions.” I am as pro life as anyone, and I want to save as many babies as possible. This is not about moral legitimacy but political reality. I’ve seen dozens of good polls on the abortion question in the last few months, many of them done in Ohio. Give people a choice between abortion restrictions very early in pregnancy with exceptions, or the pro choice position, and the pro life view has a fighting chance. Give people a heartbeat bill with no exceptions and it loses 65-35. (The reason we didn’t lose 65-35 last night is that some people who hate “no exceptions” restrictions will still refuse to vote for things like Issue 1).
Fourth, we’ve spent so much time winning a legal argument on abortion that we’ve fallen behind on the moral argument. I talked to so many decent people who voted yes on Issue 1, and their reasons varied. Some described themselves as “pro life” but hated the lack of a rape exception in Ohio law. Some were worried that Ohio law would prevent them from addressing an ectopic pregnancy, or a late term miscarriage. Some didn’t understand the “viability” standard in Issue 1, and thought that of course you should be able to abort a “non-viable” pregnancy as that would be a danger to the mother. You can criticize the propaganda effort on the other side for lying to people about these issues or confusing the populace, but it suggests we have to do a much better job of persuasion. And I’m not just talking about 30 second TV commercials–I’m talking about sustained, years long efforts to show the heart of the pro life movement.
Fifth, money. We got outspent big time on Issue 1, and across the country. Republicans are almost always outspent by Democrats. Relatedly, Democrats are better at turning out in off year elections. The national party should be focused on two, and only two issues: how to juice turnout in off year elections and how to close the finance gap with Democrats.
A lot of people put their heart and soul into this campaign. The local right to life organizations in Ohio, The Center for Christian Virtue, SBA, Governor Dewine, and so many others. I tip my hat to them.
A lot of people are celebrating right now, and I don’t care about that. I do care about the fact that because we lost, many innocent children will never have a chance to live their dreams.
There is something sociopathic about a political movement that tells young women (and men) that it is liberating to murder their own children. So let’s keep fighting for our country’s children, and let’s find a way to win.
November 9, 2023 at 9:22 pm
I’m with you. Killing children for the sins of their fathers is wrong(rape/ incest). Let the babies be born.
November 11, 2023 at 3:16 am
If you read Pope John Paul II’s Evangelium Vitae he has some important points on the topic of voting for the “lesser evil” when it comes to life issues, and on when this is morally permissible.
As for the comparisons to Nazism and slavery – first, the German people never got to vote directly on “do we kill all Jews or just some”. Nor did they ever, as far as I know, get an opportunity to vote on measures that could have rolled back the Final Solution and saved at least some Jews AFTER the Holocaust had already been underway for years. If they had, should they have rejected them because they didn’t save all Jews, and thereby allowed the killing to continue unabated?
Second, with regard to slavery, at least in America and in the British Empire it was NOT abolished all at once. Both Britain and the US abolished foreign slave TRADE long before they abolished slavery itself. Also, slavery existed in many if not all Northern states in the Revolutionary era but was gradually phased out by, for example, freeing all slaves born after a fixed date when they became adults. Should those gradual emancipation laws have been voted down because they didn’t free all slaves immediately — thereby keeping all slaves enslaved that much longer?
November 11, 2023 at 7:28 am
One last point. The issue at the federal level and in some blue states has gone beyond simply allowing abortion, into actively promoting abortion, measures that effectively compel pro-life citizens to cooperate with it (taxpayer funding, mandatory insurance coverage) and even into criminalizing pro-life activity by branding crisis pregnancy centers as “fraudulent”. The GOP needs to make defeating or rolling back these measures its #1 priority IMO.
November 11, 2023 at 9:40 am
Maybe if your church wasn’t an organization for woman-hating child molesters you’d have a better chance.
Your real problem is that you hate women who are anything but useless doormats. You don’t like it that women are outpacing men in education; you hate it when we expose harassers and rapists; you lionize women like Phyllis Schlafly and Alice von Hildebrand who made long and lucrative careers telling women to stay home, shut up and let their husband beat them.
Finally women have options other than endure life under terrible men and you and your dying church are furious about it. As the kids say, die mad about it.
November 12, 2023 at 2:35 pm
I agree that ALL Abortion should be illegal regardless but I can’t see that happening, unfortunately. I still find it so disheartening that Ohio voters voted to have abortion without limits and without parental rights for minors. The other team definitely outspent the pro-life side. They got something like $70 million, most of it from out of state.