OK. I’m getting a little tired of being told that Jesus wants universal health care. No. Actually a lot tired.
But Nicole Sotelo of the National Catholic Reporter, I guess, doesn’t care too much about my fatigue because she makes the connection that because Jesus healed the sick for free, therefore we should have free healthcare.
Jesus was perhaps one of the world’s first health care reformers. During a time in history when Greeks and Romans often traveled to a temple with offerings in exchange for healing, Jesus and his early followers healed free of charge wherever they encountered the sick, often at great peril to themselves.
In fact, healing is a constitutive element of Jesus’ ministry. His first miracles in the Gospel of Mark are casting a demon from a man and healing a woman with a fever. In the whole of the gospels, there are 41 distinct stories of physical or mental healing. Jesus heals the blind, cures the withered hand and stops the bleeding.
He called his followers to do the same. Jesus instructed his disciples to go into towns and “cure the sick who are there” (Luke 10:9). Religion, caste or payment is not a consideration; instead, mercy and healing is extended to everyone.
I wish that were true in the United States.
OK. I guess Nicole Sotelo doesn’t care that Jesus wouldn’t have supported aborting babies because a woman didn’t feel like having a baby.
But Jesus’ life is not a blueprint for government structures. Let’s think of some things that Jesus did that might not be so smart to universalize.
Jesus exorcised demons pretty regularly. Sooooo….should we have exorcists funded by the government running around casting out demons on the taxpayer dime?
Jesus turned water into wine. Does that mean taxpayers should be funding vineyards to make wine? Hey, Jesus did it so we should all be funding it, right?
Jesus changed the weather. This is one they say we’re doing and they want us to stop. (Make your mind up!)
Jesus killed a fig tree. Surely, Nicole Sotelo doesn’t want us all running around on the taxpayer dime lobbing off the branches of fig trees, does she?
Jesus raised the dead! Folks. I’m not one to point fingers but is it just me or is Nicole Sotelo arguing for a taxpayer funded Zombie Apocalypse! Oh my.
But of course, all that is very silly. And it’s just as silly for Nicole Sotelo to say what she’s saying.
Fr. Dwight Longenecker had a great point about the socialized medicine debate. He reminds us that:
Any system is only as good as the people in it. Britain’s socialized National Health Service would be a dream if the people in it were honest, hard working, compassionate and self sacrificial. Likewise, the American private health care and insurance industries would work like a dream if the people within them were honest, hard working, compassionate and self sacrificial. Both systems are just systems. Both (as systems) have strengths and weaknesses. Both would work well if the people within them worked well.
G.K.Chesterton said, “Every argument is a theological argument.” Same here. The reasons the systems are no good is because the people within them are not good, and how do we make bad people better? It is pointless simply appealing to some sort of moral code. Moral codes on their own are arbitrary. People are not dumb. They look at a moral code and ask “Why?” Without any higher principle for a moral code the moral code remains an encrypted code. A moral code without any higher being behind it is no more than a made up rule, so why should I obey it?
Systems are only made better when people are made better and people can only be made better by something called Grace, and grace can only be discovered through contact with the source of Grace, and that is why the Christian faith is not just an option, but a necessity.
Jesus taught us about the individual need for salvation. He didn’t speak to overthrowing systems of government. In fact, wasn’t that what Satan offered to him and He refused it?
It also seems to me that Jesus had a run-in with big government that didn’t end all that well. Well, eventually it did but you know what I mean.
October 6, 2009 at 4:09 am
And you expected what from the National Catholic Reporter, the voice of the moribund "Spirit" of Vatican II? Relevance, intelligence, facts, cogency?
The NCR WWJD argument is specious for all of the pertinent reasons that you have listed as well as the central issue of the intimate relationship involved in true charity between real persons– not the theft of money from American taxpayers by a socialist President and his pathetic Party of abortion, euthanasia and concupiscence.
October 6, 2009 at 5:23 am
The simple fact is that in this country, the rich can afford health care, the poor get it for free, and the workers (you know, the people that actually make and do stuff) can't afford it. The worst of all possible worlds.
I favor socializing medicine, but I favor this because of my leftism, and I'm not going to pretend that good Catholics HAVE to support this.
I would also like it fine if the government got out of the health care business and lowered my taxes so that I could afford to buy decent coverage for myself. Of course, it would bother me to see the indigent dying in the street, but then at least my kids would be able to see a doctor from time to time.
October 6, 2009 at 11:45 am
Christ himself healed the sick. He didn't start an astroturf movement to demand that Caesar do it. He also didn't hire some NCR "journalist" to do his PR — time to find another line of work Nicole.
October 6, 2009 at 12:47 pm
Our Lord's first public miracle was changing water into wine – how about the government provide free wine at weddings – and it has to be the good stuff!
October 6, 2009 at 1:19 pm
"Jesus was perhaps one of the world’s first health care reformers." That is one of the funniest things I've read in a long time. Jesus was ALL ABOUT health care reform. Hmm… seems to me that Jesus healed the sick as an outward sign that he could heal the soul. Is the government supposed to get into that next?
Dutchman, I agree with what you say 100%. In this country the rich can buy whatever they want, and the poor can get more and more for free. We middle-class people have to pay through the nose. I am all for figuring out how to get better health care for people like me… but I think that all the bills being debated now would simply make our health care system worse for everyone, which is hardly desireable.
October 6, 2009 at 1:55 pm
I think maybe we the people should get into the business of casting out demons. Let's do that at the next election!
October 6, 2009 at 2:49 pm
The Catholic Church would be a dream if the people in it were honest, hard working, compassionate and self sacrificial.
This post could us a little Grace.
October 6, 2009 at 3:36 pm
"This post could us a little Grace.
Thus the troll spaketh.
The Catholic Church has never presumed the perfection of its members – only its teachings. It would behoove you to realize the difference.
October 6, 2009 at 5:25 pm
LarryD,
Sadly, nothing makes me realize it more than the content of this post.
October 6, 2009 at 7:10 pm
If it was as easy as making Charity law, God would have told us to do it that way.
The reason you can't make charity law is the same as a popular reason people hate the Catholic church. We don't live up to our own standards, therefore how DARE DARE DARE we still espose them.
Taking away the ability for a sinful man to use his greed to help thousands of people because you just KNOW there are millions more doctors that would do it all for free is hopelessly naive and idealistic.
But we desperately seem to want to believe that, so here we are.
October 6, 2009 at 8:04 pm
William, what are you talking about? NO ONE is asking doctors to work for free, anymore than we are asking the construction workers who build our highways or the municipal workers who pick up our garbage to work for free. When our tax dollars pay for necessary services, that's not charity — that's good government!
October 6, 2009 at 10:36 pm
As William has pointed out (in different words), the charity Jesus preached is not satisfied by being taxed.
And Jesus healing for free has nothing to do with any proposed government health care system.
As someone who has lived in the past under the Canadian system, let me tell you, I have no wish to do so again. I was lucky, and a good deal younger than I am now.
October 6, 2009 at 11:21 pm
I am glad to live with the NHS, and it has saved my life a few times. However – it is a money pit and always has been. It badly needs reform to work fairly – but once established, it became politically suicidal to mess with it. Private healthcare is fine here for cosmetic stuff and one-off surgery- but ignores those with chronic conditions because insurers cherry-pick. Take note. Those who do not learn from the mistakes of history are doomed to repeat them.
October 7, 2009 at 4:32 am
Thanks, Bill. I know I'm not explaining this very well… words honestly do fail me.
Jesus healing for free IS awesome, but expecting a society where that is the standard is expecting more of society than is possible.
October 8, 2009 at 8:05 pm
The right response then is to turn it. Okay folks who want Universal Health Care because Jesus would want it…what do you think Jesus would think of funding abortion?
I think he'd say, "You should talk to my Mom."
October 9, 2009 at 7:38 pm
The abortion issue is moot as long as the Hyde Amendment is still in place.