In San Francisco, Archbishop George H. Niederauer, has recently issued his own norms for the celebration of the Extraordinary form of the Roman Rite. This has been the favorite maneuver of those Bishops not favorably disposed toward the classical liturgy.
The Archbishop throws up the usual road blocks to the liturgy. These include the stable group requirement. In SF’s case, the number is set at thirty. He also requires to 400 questions Latin test filled out in triplicate so that priests can be certified. He also warns priests that their will be no public masses without a direct request and his say so. These are all the usual tactics that other bishops have implemented as well.
However, in San Fran, they have come up with a new angle. Try to talk them out of it. If you need to, offer them a Novus Ordo in Latin, anything but the Traditional Latin Mass.
Suggest priests consider “the possibility of celebrating the ordinary form in the Latin language…as an alternative to using the extraordinary form in satisfying the spiritual needs of the faithful who desire a Latin Mass”;
There is no mention in the article whether the tests for Latin and rubrics will be required for any priest wishing to celebrate a Latin Novus Ordo. Somehow, I don’t think there will be.
I cannot help but chuckle that they hope to do the bait and switch. Like used car salesmen, they hope to convince you to take a different model than the one advertised.
December 15, 2007 at 7:00 pm
If only some bishops were as effective a reducing abortion as they are of reducing access to the TLM.
December 15, 2007 at 11:23 pm
It seems to me that we have to recognize that the TLM is meant to be temporary. If you read the serious, orthodox scholars before Vatican II, they all wanted reform–but not Bugnini-style Neo-Lutheran reform. A little more vernacular, genuine, pious participation of the people in singing the chants, taking their proper parts, etc. The language of the MP which hopes that the TLM and the Novus Ordo will enrich each other seems to suggest that Benedict doesn’t see the TLM as the perfect liturgy. Are we in danger of an inflexible antiquarianism sometimes?