Just for a moment I want you to imagine that Roman Polanski was a priest. Frightening, yes? But for the sake of my point imagine that he’s a priest who drugged and raped a thirteen year old.
Imagine he’s a priest who fled to France so as to avoid punishment for his crime. Imagine that he flaunted his freedom in America’s face for decades.
Now imagine that Roman Polanski as a priest was apprehended by the police after all those years. Now, imagine what the media would be saying.
If Roman Polanski were a priest would we be getting quotes like these from the media?:
With the state Legislature forced to make dramatic cuts in the prison budget and a three-judge federal panel having recently ordered California lawmakers to release as many as 40,000 inmates in response to the scandalous overcrowding of the California state prison system, it seems like an especially inauspicious time for the L.A. County district attorney’s office to be spending some of our few remaining tax dollars seeing if it can finally, after all these years, put Roman Polanski behind bars.
And:
Meanwhile, Polanski’s victim, Samantha Geimer, long ago announced that she had forgiven the filmmaker for his transgressions and supported various efforts to have the case against him dismissed.
Or this:
you’d hope that L.A. County prosecutors had better things to do than cause an international furor by hounding a film director for a 32-year-old sex crime, especially one that Polanski’s victim wants to put behind her
Or this from The Washington Post:
“The French foreign minister, Bernard Kouchner, called the arrest “a little sinister” after such a long lapse. The French culture minister, Fr?d?ric Mitterrand, said he was upset to see Polanski “thrown to the lions for an old story that doesn’t really make any sense.”
And this:
Fellow filmmakers, including the directors Costa Gavras and Wong Kar-Wai, along with actresses Monica Bellucci and Fanny Ardant, signed a petition in France that called the arrest “inadmissible.”
Now, could you imagine the mainstream media running quotes defending a priest from serving his sentence in a similar case.
In fact, wasn’t it the same mainstream media who used the abuse scandal to tar the entire Church?
If Roman Polanski were a priest France wouldn’t love him, the media wouldn’t love him, the film making industry wouldn’t love him. But he’s a big time director. He’s edgy. He’s a talent. He’s one of them. So they forgive. And they urge us all to forget. If this keeps up pretty soon the media is going to start asking what the thirteen year old was wearing before the rape.
Update: I write it and then it happens. Wow. Whoopi Goldberg just said Roman Polanski didn’t really commit “rape-rape.” Not even sure what that really means. But wow, they’re sinking to the depths pretty quick. Hot Air has the story and the video.
Update 2: David Gibson of Politics Daily had a similar take. His is better written and smarter than mine. But hey he’s paid to do this stuff. Here’s the link to Politics Daily.
September 29, 2009 at 4:30 pm
This wouldn't happen if they'd just allow movie directors to marry.
Uhh….
I thought the *exact* same thing when this story broke.
September 29, 2009 at 6:08 pm
sigh…remember that anti-Catholicism is the last acceptable prejudice. Anything goes…unless you're Catholic.
September 29, 2009 at 6:38 pm
Ha. "If they allow movie directors to marry."
That's a funny line. But I think most Hollywood types believe in marriage. Why, they believe in it so much that they often get married numerous times.
September 29, 2009 at 7:14 pm
You gave a good example of the double standard. Our pastor said Sunday that the world considers sex crimes as trivial matters, when 50 years ago rape was punished by life in prison or capital punishment, now they let them out of prison after a short time but if you are a movie director I guess you are exempt form any punishment.
September 29, 2009 at 8:08 pm
patt s – good point. Look what sexual liberation has done for us!
September 29, 2009 at 8:08 pm
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
September 29, 2009 at 8:33 pm
Polanski deserves to face justice for the rape of a 13-year-old girl no matter how long ago it happened, no matter what his occupation, and no matter who publicly tries to defend him.
The judge won't care what Whoopi Goldberg thinks and that's what matters.
September 29, 2009 at 8:38 pm
No need for the "Jewish" remark above.
September 29, 2009 at 10:26 pm
What, does Mel Gibson frequent this place? Seriously, your anti-Semitism is showing. Get a life.
September 30, 2009 at 2:42 pm
patt s,
50 years ago, a husband could rape his wife and it would not have been considered a crime.
50 years ago, there were no rape crisis centers in the US to act as advocates for the victims of rape.
50 years ago, there was no Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which allocated "$1.6 billion to enhance investigation and prosecution of the violent crime perpetrated against women, increased pre-trial detention of the accused, imposed automatic and mandatory restitution on those convicted, and allowed civil redress in cases prosecutors chose to leave unprosecuted."
50 years ago, there was no "Office on Violence Against Women" in the DOJ. This office was established in 2000 with the reauthorization of VAWA and has "the authority to administer the grants authorized under VAWA, as well as develop federal policy around issues relating to domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking."
None of these advances would have been possible if womenfolk hadn't organized and got'r done. Tragically, rape is still massively under-reported and under-prosecuted so there is still a long, long way to go.
September 30, 2009 at 3:45 pm
The cases are just so different. You expect this from boozing, corrupt, avant-artsy hollywood types. But even the world recognizes the horrible, spirit-twisting hypocrisy of a person who stands in persona Christi raping you, and his cadre moving him around covertly so that he can rape more.
So, no, I don't get how Catholics like me should be offended by this. The wolves will do what the wolves will do. The media rightly took the shepherds down. Who would have ever exposed it? The Church? Ha.
Thank God for the media and state's part in exposing the scandal. They did me and my family a great service, and they did the Body of Christ a great service.
September 30, 2009 at 4:47 pm
"The cases are just so different. You expect this from boozing, corrupt, avant-artsy hollywood types. But even the world recognizes the horrible, spirit-twisting hypocrisy of a person who stands in persona Christi raping you, and his cadre moving him around covertly so that he can rape more."
The point of this posting was the "horrible, spirit-twisting hypocrisy"–which we've come to expect of hollywood and the amoral celebrities that tell us all to forget all about RP's rape of a young girl when they would ask for the head of any Catholic priest who did the same thing. It's more than okay to remark on (and lament) the hypocrisy evident in this case. As for your accusation that the Church would never expose the predatory priests, I would be careful not to indict the entire Church for the sins of some of her bishops and priests. No one has the right to condemn the whole Church when God makes use of other people (with the state or the media, in this case) to expose some of the wolves within the Church. I've no doubt many priests and even bishops did what they could to protect the sheep from these predators. Who's helping Polanski's victim?
September 30, 2009 at 4:52 pm
Ah, but anon 10:45, they're doing nobody a great service by allowing this rapist sicko go for a crime he was convicted for. No matter what the woman involved thinks, it does society as a whole no great service to allow rape to go unpunished.
And since when is rape ever ok? By your logic suicide bombing should be ok from radical Muslim types because "you'd expect it from" them.
I agree with you on one thing- that the priest scandal was exposed at all was a good thing. Any time a bright light can be shone on the darkness and corruption rooted out is a good thing. But I just don't agree with your attitude that somehow Mr. Polanski's offense was less than one of those priest involved in the scandal. Rape is rape and rapists should be held accountable- no matter what "type" of rapist they are.
October 1, 2009 at 12:12 am
Great point, Matthew. Many people lobbied for the lifting of statutes of limitations specifically for clergy abuse cases. I'm not saying that what a (relatively) few disturbed priests did, and a few bishops to cover it up, was right. But the persecution of the Church overall was a little overzealous to say the least. And the double standard favoring one of their own is insane.
October 1, 2009 at 2:03 am
Be careful what you wish for…. This is so absolutely ridicules that its comical. Per usual people will use any and every opportunity to attack the Church. They are actually using the Polanski case to do just that.
"Victims of clergy sexual abuse staged a protest outside the district attorney's office Wednesday to protest celebrities who have publicly supported Polanski since his arrest in Zurich, Switzerland over the weekend.
"It is very, very similar to the allegations against the priests … and no one says that we should just ignore the priest pedophilia," said Katie Buckland, executive director of the California Women's Law Center and former Los Angeles city attorney, who was not affiliated with the protesters.""
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090930/ap_en_ce/us_roman_polanski_today_s_climate
October 1, 2009 at 3:45 am
Why should we be surprised? "The world loves its own."
October 1, 2009 at 4:05 am
Polanski should be tried in Court. As for the comparison with a Priest. He is not like a priest in that he probably publically and privately thinks sex is Ok outside of marriage. A priest on the other hand professes sex is for mariage and a priest vows to keep celebacy. Polanksi is not a hypocrit…he may be that. He is a rappist, formicator and child molester.
October 1, 2009 at 4:13 am
Sarah –
You state: "But I just don't agree with your attitude that somehow Mr. Polanski's offense was less than one of those priest involved in the scandal."
Well, they are both equally awful offenses, of course, but I am more shocked and scandalized when a priest does this – especially if he comes complete with a team of accomplices that move him from one raping opportunity to the next, hiding him from prosecution. Consider Shakespeare's Sonnet 94:
"The summer's flower is to the summer sweet,
Though to itself it only live and die,
But if that flower with base infection meet,
The basest weed outbraves his dignity:
For sweetest things turn sourest by their deeds;
Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds."
As for blaming the "whole Church" for the scandal, I do not. But I blame the whole hierarchy, right up to Pope JP2, who had the likes of Marcel Maciel as a great friend and benefactor. I think Ratzinger knew, and have the vivid and sadly comical image of him slapping ABC reporter Brian Ross when Ross questioned him about ignoring Maciel's misdeeds. He ignored the pleas of the faithful for years…. and years and years until the man simply died of old age.
So, no more naivete masquerading as piety, at least not for me. I have been there and done that.
October 1, 2009 at 11:51 am
Well, catholics are used to that sort of persecution and discrimination. Everything catholics do well, is bad for the world, all the wrong things the world make are to be praised, they think.
It hurts but we live in a persecution time.