More seriously–that implies (if the header was written to reflect the actual content of the story and "study") that SOME would scare-monger "teen" pregnancy stats by including NON-"teen" women.
That's consistent with "Youth Killed By Guns" methodology, where the "youth" in question are by and large, over the age of 18.
Dad29–
that's one of my faves, too. Especially since I can't find any stats on unwed teen pregnancies, and several states don't report their stats, anyways.
October 3, 2010 at 6:05 pm
God that is hilarious! I almost peed in my pants I was laughing to hard!!!
October 4, 2010 at 2:46 am
Statistics is not as rigorous as math. So between 19 & 25 is still within a given confidence interval.
October 4, 2010 at 6:41 pm
More seriously–that implies (if the header was written to reflect the actual content of the story and "study") that SOME would scare-monger "teen" pregnancy stats by including NON-"teen" women.
That's consistent with "Youth Killed By Guns" methodology, where the "youth" in question are by and large, over the age of 18.
October 4, 2010 at 8:59 pm
Dad29–
that's one of my faves, too. Especially since I can't find any stats on unwed teen pregnancies, and several states don't report their stats, anyways.
October 6, 2010 at 2:01 am
More proof that the American public education system is failing steadily by the nanosecond….