Definitely worth a watch. Former Senator Rick Santorum rejects JFK’s separation of church and state pretty forcefully.
Definitely worth a watch. Former Senator Rick Santorum rejects JFK’s separation of church and state pretty forcefully.
© 2024 Creative Minority Report — Powered by WordPress
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑
December 15, 2010 at 11:57 pm
Only after Sarah Palin did in her new book. This warped view of religious liberty is warped as it is opportunist.
December 16, 2010 at 12:56 am
Secular is a myth. You cannot serve two masters. People follow the rule of God or the rule of men. Most "atheists" and a lot of Christians are simply state worshippers, converted from religious faith in schools to "secular" humanism, state worship and the materialist scientific worldview. Faith in governments of men is living by the sword, weak faith in God.
December 16, 2010 at 3:28 am
Santorum's a good guy, and worth paying attention to. He's deserving of better than an ignorant dismissal as "warped." In fact he's not warped. He's right.
December 16, 2010 at 4:24 am
Mr. Santorum needs to learn there is absolutely no respect for Jesus Christ in the Freemason Founders of America.
George Washington was the Founding Father who could not make babies…he has no descendants.
Thomas Jefferson's belief about Christ:
"The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the Supreme Being as his father in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter."
—Thomas Jefferson, in an 1823 letter to John Adams
Freemasons believe Lucifer is God, and have no belief in Christ…they hate Him. So separation of Church and State is a moot issue to them. The U.S.Consttution was written from the view of gnostics; Nonserviam. We will not serve Christ.
*
December 16, 2010 at 11:47 am
Its comments like this that Mr. Santorum lost his last election. He's a has been. Old news. Washed up. The state of Pennsylvania has moved on.
December 16, 2010 at 12:36 pm
Come to Our Defense, what you have just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
December 16, 2010 at 1:42 pm
Santorum has been criticizing JFK on this matter for years.
December 16, 2010 at 2:06 pm
Can anybody dispute what he said?
. . . .
I didn't think so.
December 16, 2010 at 8:07 pm
I seem to recall the State of Pennsylvania being rather irate at Sen. Casey, a self-proclaimed pro-lifer, voting for Obamacare with the abortion funding. Maybe Pennsylvania has a little buyer's remorse?
December 16, 2010 at 8:14 pm
To say the state of Pennsylvania has moved on is rather interesting in that they elected Pat Toomey Senator, who agrees with Santorum on pretty much everything.
December 16, 2010 at 10:15 pm
Whether the state of Pennsylvania has moved on or not has absolutely no bearing on the truth of Santorum's point. One would refer to that response ( that Pa. has moved on) as a red herring and note it is a logical fallacy and carries no substantive weight . What one should be looking for is whether the former Senator speaks the truth. One may argue the point though I agree with him. Kennedy's actions has short circuited honest discussions and the Senator's mentioning of Hugo Black and his motivations is arguable but has basis in facts. One only needs to examine Black's role in the Fr. Coyle case in Al.
December 17, 2010 at 5:42 pm
SANTORUM 2012
December 17, 2010 at 7:07 pm
Looks like the Kool-Aid still hasn't worn off Rich. How sad.
December 19, 2010 at 5:24 pm
And someone is still drinking the blood of a dead man… wake-up smell MTV