A New Hampshire public Middle School gave students a sex survey without parental notification. The survey asked about their sexual experiences and their sexual orientation. Nice, huh? Don’t worry, they said it was just a mix up. You know, these things happen.
Parents were notified with a letter sent home stating that the school would be surveying their children about alcohol and drugs. What they were not told was that the questionnaire also contained advanced questions about sex, especially considering this age range of 11 to 14.
Fox 25 spoke with the school’s superintendent who said it was an “oversight” that the note sent home to parents did not include the term “sex.”
One question, partially obstructed in the video above, asks about how often a student uses condoms or a Depo-Provera shot (birth control injection) when they have sex. Other questions asked are: “Would you say that you are only straight/heterosexual, mostly straight/heterosexual, bisexual, mostly lesbian/gay or only lesbian/gay?
Which of the following best describes you: Female, male, transgender, male-to-female, transgender female-to-male, transgender, do not identify as exclusively male or female, or not sure?
It’s no wonder, public schools have to trap children into their schools.
April 16, 2014 at 1:45 pm
Only if you believe Hell is real.
April 16, 2014 at 1:46 pm
We don't have any more choice than the Jews did. We're being forced into ghettos by insecure heretic bishops who are afraid that the Mass celebrated properly will shine a light on their ugly heresy.
April 16, 2014 at 1:57 pm
And of course they also offer the mandatory GLBT group where you can "come and meet great people"
April 16, 2014 at 2:08 pm
A Jewish seder meal has no place in a Catholic Church. It's a ritual of a dead religion, a religion that doesn't believe in Jesus Christ as the son of God.
April 16, 2014 at 2:49 pm
They need questions more consistent with the age range. They are kids, let them be kids. THis urgency to make them sexually pliant is such schizophrenia as they simultaneously inundate people with sexual messages, then condemn priests for ephebophilia and praise female teachers who have sex with the same young boys. Schizo?
How about an appropriate survey:
1. Do you jump in the mud puddle or do you walk around it?
2. Making snow forts: really like it, sorta like it, not so much or not at all
3. What is your favorite candy?
April 16, 2014 at 4:00 pm
What good can come of that sort of thing? How about Jesus Christ communing with the faithful who receive his Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity? I generally find that to be a good thing.
April 16, 2014 at 4:05 pm
I'm not "defending" what is, to my eyes, an ugly liturgy. What I am asserting, with great vehemence, is that the Holy Mass, offered in good faith is never, EVER, "demonic." That every time Christ is made sacramentally present and every time his faithful commune with Him there is more goodness and more beauty present than the most ham-fisted liturgist in the world could ever fully obscure.
There is a Devil and he is active in this world. But Holy Mass is never in his bag of tricks. Every valid Mass represents in our time and in our midst the definitive defeat of the Devil's kingdom.
April 16, 2014 at 8:16 pm
How dare you!!!!! They're in "full communion."
April 16, 2014 at 8:17 pm
Go to Youtube and search for this from Video Sancto:
Seder Meals Violate the First Commandment
April 16, 2014 at 8:27 pm
Spot on, Maggie Sullivan. Distasteful, inadvisable, disrespectful, confusing, detrimental…. all hallmarks of the devil and hell.
I think this kind of incongruous, disorienting imagery is literally of the devil. You know how when you open a door and smoke from a smoky room comes in first? Paul VI spoke of the smoke of Satan entering the sanctuary. It seems that the devils have indeed followed the smoke into the sanctuary.
As for bare validity, it may indeed have been a valid Mass. A Black Mass of avowed satanists may also meet the requirements of validity. A wedding with everyone dressed in monkey costumes may also be a valid wedding. The requirements of bare validity may be met, yet the proceedings may still be a mockery and thus blasphemous. This is a model example.
April 16, 2014 at 8:39 pm
Joseph, you'll get nowhere with Stephen. He's a model example of the trickiness of those processed by the diabolically tricky Hippie Council, aka the Judas Council, aka the Second Vatican Council.
For more on this diabolical trickiness, go to Youtube and search for this:
Bp. Bernard Fellay: On the Crisis in the Church, playlist
Also search for this:
Vatican II Wreckage, playlist
April 16, 2014 at 8:42 pm
Not to worry. They're in "full communion."
April 16, 2014 at 8:50 pm
The mission of these ecclesiastical vandals is, precisely, vandalism. As they put it, "To be a visible, progressive Catholic community…. to transcend traditional boundaries and draw those who seek spiritual growth and social justice."
April 16, 2014 at 8:51 pm
Of course. It's the traditionalists' fault.
Are there no depths to which NeoCatholics will sink?
April 16, 2014 at 8:58 pm
Unlikely. Most future priests are receiving a thoroughly disastrous seminary "education." They're being indoctrinated in accord with the toxicity of the Hippie Council Revolution, aka the Judas Council Revolution, aka the Second Vatican Council of 1962-65, the disastrous nature of which is usually radically understated. Here's one who didn't understate it:
"At the close of a long life (for I was born in 1905 and I now see the year 1990), I can say that it has been marked by exceptional world events: three world wars, that which took place from 1914 to 1918, that which took place from 1939 to 1945, and that of the Second Vatican Council from 1962 to 1965. The disasters caused by these three wars, and especially by the last of them, are incalculable in the domain of material ruins, but even more so in the spiritual realm."
-Abp. Marcel Lefebvre, Prologue to his book, Spiritual Journey
April 16, 2014 at 10:24 pm
Back at ya' government polititions, beaurocrats and educators!
mmmoooooooo, baaahhaaaah, oink, oink, oink, cluck, cluck, cluck and take a bit of your own "gobble-dee-gook survey, you perverts! I want to know "all" your personal, intimate, relevant sexual information and histories before you enter the classroom.I want it on record before engaging, interacting or teaching another lesson with a child present!
I want that info tagged under parental notification, as well as, "public" access.
Let's really get to the "bottom" of it! Looks pretty nasty already!