Check out the language adopted by the Associated Press to describe the outrage among Catholics about Notre Dame’s invitation to President Obama:
Many Catholics are angered by Obama’s planned appearance at the May 17 ceremony because of his decisions to provide federal funding for embryonic stem cell research and international family planning groups that provide abortions or educate about the procedure.
The consensus Thursday on the campus of the nation’s largest Catholic university was that any president should be welcomed at Notre Dame.
“People are definitely entitled to their outrage, but I think the main thing is to see that it’s an honor to have the president of the United States come to speak here whether you agree with him or not,” said Katie Woodward, a political science junior from Philadelphia.
Justin Mack, a senior film major from Dallas, agreed.
“I didn’t vote for him and there are a lot of things I don’t agree with him or support. But I feel like for this event people need to put that aside,” said Mack, a senior film major from Dallas. “My hope is that doesn’t distract too much from what the weekend is about, which is the graduation.”
But the distractions have been mounting, including sharply worded letters from two bishops.
See how they take the word of a student and then repeat it as their own. In that way, the reporter can just say they were simply using the words of an interview. But putting that quote there is what makes the reporter able to do label the bishop’s letters “distractions.”
We don’t even get any Catholics upset about the invitation until much further down in the piece.
And while I’m not saying that the consensus on campus is against Obama’s presence, how does the reporter verify that statement. How many people did the reporter speak with? That’s just thrown in there and we’re supposed to take the reporter’s word for it?
And here’s the ending of the piece which worries me to no end about the state of Catholic education:
Chris Carrington, a political science major from the Chicago area, said he doesn’t see how Obama’s appearance at Notre Dame contradicts Catholic values.
“To not allow someone here because of their beliefs seems a little hypocritical and contradictory to what the mission of the university and church should be,” he said.
Commence pulling out your hair now.
By the way, if you haven’t done so already, sign the petition at http://notredamescandal.com/
As of this writing the petition is up to 182,000 signatures!
March 27, 2009 at 1:43 pm
Hair pulling is right. Sigh.
March 27, 2009 at 1:52 pm
as Glenn Beck describes:
“there’s not enough duct tape in the world to wrap around my head to keep it from exploding!”
We just have pray for God’s will…
March 27, 2009 at 2:14 pm
These princes and princesses are the product of post-Vatican II non-thinking and popular culture. Even so, and even with a few goofy faculty members, they should be THINKING.
March 27, 2009 at 2:23 pm
We can always write AP to criticise their bias as shown by their inaccurate reporting. If more send feedback along these lines, then they will realize where their readers’ sentiments lay and might rethink their approach. Recent Gallup poll results show more Americans withdrawing support from pro-abortion policies.
March 27, 2009 at 2:32 pm
At the rate these things are going, we are going to be bald.
March 27, 2009 at 2:39 pm
What percentage of the student body is Catholic at UND? Let’s not even talk about the faculty…
March 27, 2009 at 2:56 pm
Can’t someone organize a nightly Rosary procession on campus, begging Our Lady’s intervention on behalf of her own school? Isn’t she the patroness? Isn’t she the Queen of Heaven AND Earth? Do we believe this or don’t we?
IF we do, then why all the talk about signatures, and noisy demonstrations? Put her to the test. “Remember O most gracious Virgin Mary that never was it known that anyone who fled to thy protection, implored thy help or sought thy interession was left unaided.”
Are there not shrines to Our Lady in every major city, and Notre Dame grads as well…with rosaries and shoes and dim memories of processions and pilgrimages?
“Thus says the Lord, “Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein…”
Jeremia 6, 10
March 27, 2009 at 3:29 pm
Thanks for writing about this. The reporter also conveniently doesn’t mention the online petition with its 180,000+ signatures- just “hundreds” of letters to the student newspaper. Total, from both sides.
March 27, 2009 at 3:48 pm
Lee Gilbert: You’re right about the primacy of prayer. It reminds us of Who is in-charge and Who will effect the changes. It also purifies our motives. However, grace builds on nature. So, the Holy Spirit will move all to pray specially those with a mystical and contemplative bent. The same Spirit will move the thinkers to analyze and communicate the sophistries and inconsistencies via blogs, the sociable types will engage their networks, the doers will build barracades etc… (pick a type then an activity) The same Holy Spirit moving everyone in various ways to defend our Lady, the Mother of Life. – ain’t life grand!
March 27, 2009 at 4:01 pm
“To not allow here because of their beliefs…”
Yeah, I see what you mean, Matthew. I’m concerned about college students using split infinitives too!
~cmpt
March 27, 2009 at 4:20 pm
This is an all around poorly reported article. I stopped reading when I saw ND called
the nation’s largest Catholic university.
It isn’t. DePaul in Chicago is the nations largest Catholic university. When a reporter is starting off with that kind of easily checked factual error I figure everything else that they write is just as wrong.
March 28, 2009 at 2:06 am
I think if you really are that worried about them inviting Obama just because of your religious beliefs and his beliefs you are not respecting him as our president nor are you respecting america.
Read more about it in my blog:
http://www.thisisawebsite.info/2009/03/27/why-notre-dame-is-not-an-embarrassment/
March 28, 2009 at 3:08 am
you are not respecting him as our president nor are you respecting america.
Maybe that statement would carry a little more credibility *if you actually capitalized the appropriate words.*
March 28, 2009 at 5:07 pm
Mantra2- Your accusation resembles the fact that you’re going to call me a racist if I don’t like Obama. Strawman argument. As a devout Catholic, I have every right to be up in arms about Obama going to Notre Dame.
March 31, 2009 at 12:30 am
This is extremely ignorant. Why would anyone pull their hair out at the last quote? Religious tolerance is something Jesus would have agreed with.
March 31, 2009 at 3:07 am
Tolerance for evil was pretty low on Jesus’ list of things to do.