I know some liberal types will read this and think that the Governor of New York has just damned the children of New York to dental problems. They’ll suspect Big Dentistry is behind this curious veto that might’ve saved thousands if not millions of kids serious dental work. Not CMR.
We don’t mind that this cute little sippy cup slurping kid…:
might turn into this guy just because of a sippy cup:
We find them both adorable.
And if a parent wants to keep their kid drinking from sippy cups up until college that might actually happen. We don’t need the New York legislature putting warnings on sippy cups.
The AP reports:
The sippy cup warning label fight is over in New York, for now.
The bill that required a dental decay warning on sippy cups and baby bottles was among 23 vetoes Gov. David Paterson issued Monday…
For now…New Yorkers will have to take their chances with sippy cups. The warning label would have noted the risk of early childhood tooth decay from undefined prolonged use of a “vessel with a duckbilled lid, bill-shaped extension or bill-shaped spout.” The legislation also covered baby bottles.
Trafficking in sippy cups without warning labels would have resulted in a civil penalty of up to $250 for the first offense and $1,000 for repeat offenders.
“Brief warning labels are simply not the best vehicle to convey detailed information about general parental practice and proper use of a product that is not inherently dangerous,” Paterson wrote in his veto message.
Can you believe this was an actual bill? Can you believe that New York State is so far gone that Governor David Patterson is the voice of reason?
Did you get the part about “trafficking in sippy cups.” Seriously? Trafficking? Really? It’s madness. Madness I say.
August 3, 2010 at 12:42 am
"Trafficking in sippy cups"? Can you imagine keeping a straight face while uttering that phrase?
Harrumph.
August 3, 2010 at 1:22 am
We need the border patrol to stop undocumented sippy cups.
– Mack
August 3, 2010 at 1:53 am
Yo, keep the sippy cup trafficking on the down low, man. I am pulling in some serious coin over here, with at least two of my brood (and all their friends) in unlabeled sippies at all times.
I can get you a good deal, people . . .
August 3, 2010 at 2:38 am
Yes, I suppose it does sound absurd, but let me tell you, there are hundreds of thousands of infants out there put to bed with a bottle or sippy cup filled with milk or juice. They fall asleep with it in their mouthhs and it bathes their teeth in sugar. They end up losing all their baby teeth by age 3 or so and it is not pretty. It is painful and requires much dental hardware and restoration until permanent teeth come in. It is a social tragedy and is due to parental stupidity and/or laziness, for the most part. Rather than a written warning, every sippy cup or baby bottle ought to have a picture of a toddler with rotten, black snags in his mouth and with a warning "See what will happen to your kid if you put him to bed with a juice or milk bottle/sippy cup". So many modern children suffer at the hands of their parents. Public health is NOT a bad thing.
August 3, 2010 at 2:40 am
And under Obamacare YOU will be paying for all the dental work these children need. On the other hand, I believe Medicare is already paying for it.
Believe me, people, it is a real disease, and it is called "Bottle Mouth".
August 3, 2010 at 3:28 am
I'm sure that somewhere in the 2000 page Obamacare bill, there is something to cover "Sippy Lips."
August 3, 2010 at 12:19 pm
Perhaps the warning label should be on the parents who allow their children to sleep with bottles or sippy cups. Easily discovered after an hour session with a child therapist in a closed off room, the infant/toddler will identify the parent as an offender. The parent is then slapped across the forehead with the warning label "I contribute to the rottening of my children's teeth".
Done.
August 3, 2010 at 3:22 pm
Forget investing in gold – invest in "Pre-ban" Sippy Cups! I am going to go buy about a hundred of them and store them in my vault along with my MRE's and my Forever Stamps from the Post Office.
Seriously – THIS is the job for government: Public service ads. Why don't they simply show a few commercials on Oprah that mention the stupidity of putting your kid to bed with ANYTHING other than a pacifier?
What a vacuous regulation.
On the other hand, there has been a rise in sippy cup-related gang violence around here….
August 3, 2010 at 6:11 pm
Anonymous, you are correct about Bottle Mouth, but is a government-mandated warning label really going to accomplish anything?
Dumb parents are going to do stupid things, regardless of warning labels. And it's not like the toddler is going to see the warning label and think "whoa, I better not drink from this tonight while I'm falling asleep."
August 3, 2010 at 11:00 pm
pppssstt, i've got some sippy cups, a brandy lollipop for teething, a jolly jumper and a walker with WHEELS on it for sale… just try not to re-sell them to stupid people…
August 4, 2010 at 12:36 am
Phew – I'm ever so glad it was vetoed. For a minute I thought I was going to have to take a sharpie and write a warning label on my breast 😉 My dc's dentist liked to rant about the dangers of nursing as well as sippy cups…