I love this story because it reveals how dumb our elites actually are and how illogical it is to be pro-abortion. Love this.
Pro-choice Oklahoma Rep. Forrest Bennet, D, recently found himself in a lurch after he proposed HB3129, a bill that would require the father of a baby to pay for half of the medical care related to the mother’s pregnancy. Bennet meant the bill as a kind of vindictive response to the state’s restriction on abortion.
Bennet tweeted, “This week I filed HB3129, which codifies that a father’s financial responsibility to his baby & their mom begins at conception. If Oklahoma is going to restrict a woman’s right to choose, we sure better make sure the man involved can’t just walk away from his responsibility.”
The text of the bill required that the father pay for 50 percent of the pregnancy costs. The bill stated, “If paternity is disputed, the biological father owes no duty under this section until the biological father’s paternity is established.” Pregnancy costs could be retroactively required in the case that paternity was not established until later.
In a surprise to Bennet, however, conservatives seized on the bill and enthusiastically voiced their support for it. Even satire site “The Babylon Bee’s” non-satire sister site, “Not The Bee,” picked up on the proposal, celebrating Bennet as “the pro-lifer of the year.”
Fr. Matthew P. Schneider chimed in with, “Great move! Let’s pass these bills in all 50 states.”
Another pro-life supporter tweeted, “The fact that you frame your proposal this way leads me to believe that you don’t understand our prolife movement. We 100% believe in personal responsibility, for fathers as well as mothers.”
After it became clear that he had stepped in a trap of his own making, Bennet announced he would change the bill, tweeting, “Let me get this out of the way: obviously I’m not moving forward with this bill as written. I’m glad many of you understood the idea but it clearly needs work. So to actual constituents of mine like @realmartypeercy who requested that I go back to the drawing board, I hear you.”
In another tweet, he stated, “Many of you got the subtext that Oklahoma is champing at the bit to outlaw abortion & define life as beginning at conception. But if you didn’t, you might think I want those things. I do not.”
Finally, he explained, “Planning for that possible reality is important though, because as those of us who believe in abortion access fight for it, we also need to mitigate the consequences of legislation that pushes us in the other direction.”
Conservatives were thrilled to see the bill introduced because it made the same two critical points they’ve been making for years: 1) life begins at conception, and 2) a father holds equal parentage with the mother.
Conservatives fully support men being required to support their child, therefore the concept behind this bill is one we should all get behind: Men should take care of their families.”
Think about this for a moment. A pro-abortion politician couldn’t acknowledge that a man should take responsibility for his unborn child because it would acknowledge the unborn child as someone to take responsibility for like an actual human being.
February 10, 2022 at 9:39 am
Of course you don’t mean fathers are equally RESPONSIBLE for the day-to-day grunt work of childrearing. Dads can hand over cash and then take all the glory for the kid’s accomplishments.
I would have strongly supported a bill that requires ‘fathers’ to do all the housework and cook all the meals for the pregnant woman and then be ENTIRELY responsible for the baby for the first eight weeks or so. Make me do the actual, real, hard work of taking care of kids and you’ll all have vasectomies in a week.
February 10, 2022 at 9:43 am
And if it isn’t clear enough, paying only half of her medical expenses is below the least you should do. If you really were pro-life and not merely pro-birth and, mostly, ‘punish the sluts who have sex,’ you would make it so that pregnancy and childbirth didn’t cause women any inconvenience at all. Certainly that’s how men experience life in a traditional family — all the sugar and none of the shit.
February 10, 2022 at 10:03 am
Karen, you are sooooooo out of touch!
With each of our children I DID housework, turns in the middle of the night with the babies as well as the others woke up by the baby, and still worked more than 40 hours a week!
So as you so undignified put it, I did experience the shit in many ways! Although, my wife definately was sugar. So you did get that correct. I definately got lots of sugar.
You really need to get in touch with some real men and not the lefty Woosies you apparently know.
Have a blessed day! I will!
February 10, 2022 at 10:05 am
Oh, also.
My wife wasn’t working when the children were little, so I did provide more than half! I think you can even figure that out!
Also, children are NOT an inconvenience! They are love!
God bless!
February 11, 2022 at 8:35 am
I don’t believe you, but even if you did all the work you say you did, that makes one of you. The overwhelming majority of men don’t do any housework and if we go back to the ‘woman stays home and he has a job and keeps all the money’ model conservatives want, that number will go down to zero. It’s only because of feminism that any man has been guilted into doing any housework at all.
Seriously, you want women reduced back to the status of chattel, even if you’re too cowardly to admit it. If women are noting but housewives again, that reduces the competition so that worthless men can advance in the work world AND means that women have to have a husband so the even worse men get wives to do all their shit work. Nothing about social conservatism is for anyone’s good; it’s only about keeping the worst men in control and making life miserable for women.